Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with concrete prompt frameworks and worked example scripts, and it uses a clean one-level-deep reference structure with all bundle files present and clearly linked. Its main weaknesses are redundancy (the workflow is restated across multiple sections) and the absence of validation checkpoints in the creation workflow.
Suggestions
Collapse the 6阶段 workflow and the 标准流程 section into a single sequenced list to remove the duplicated restating of steps and tighten conciseness.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint (e.g. verify the script fits the target duration and that each 痛点→产品→解决 beat lands before finalizing) to raise workflow clarity.
Move the three full worked-example scripts into references/video_templates.md and keep only one condensed example inline to reduce body length while preserving the reference structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The content is substantially domain-specific and actionable, but the 6阶段 workflow and 标准流程 section restate the same steps, the 痛点切入→产品展示→痛点解决 structure repeats 4–5 times, and 注意事项 re-lists principles already covered — fitting 'mostly efficient but could be tightened' rather than lean (3) or generic-padding (1). | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete fill-in prompt frameworks, specific time allocations (痛点切入3-5秒/产品展示5-8秒), and three worked examples with an exact output format (【痛点切入，5秒】中景：…) that are copy-paste ready for an instruction skill, matching the fully-executable-guidance anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The six stages are clearly sequenced, but there are no validation checkpoints or error-recovery feedback loops within the workflow (A/B testing is only an optional post-hoc step), fitting 'sequence present but checkpoints missing' rather than the explicit-validation anchor 3. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Four real, well-named reference files are all linked via clear markdown paths in both the product-typed 可选分支 and the 资源索引, one level deep with easy navigation, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled one-level-deep references' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |