Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a well-structured, highly actionable skill body with concrete runnable commands, clear stage mapping, explicit failure-handling feedback loops, and a clean one-level reference to a real bundle script. Its only mild weakness is a few trimmable explanatory phrases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficiently organized into focused sections and largely assumes Claude's competence; only minor phrases (e.g. the 复用价值 framing) could be trimmed without losing clarity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It gives copy-paste-ready executable commands for all three stages (`python skills/four-color-cards/scripts/run_four_color_cards.py --stage {extract|review|propose}`), a real entry point, and concrete output paths — fully executable and covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The extract→review→propose sequence is clear and the 失败处理 section provides explicit fallbacks (LLM 不可用→规则引擎, 超时→pending_review, 来源缺失→标注) plus the 溯源铁律 enforcement; only minor explicit validation checkpoints are missing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The SKILL.md is a well-organized overview with a single clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference to the real script `scripts/run_four_color_cards.py`; navigation is easy and content is appropriately split. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |