Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is well-structured with a concrete output template, clear workflow, and properly signaled reference files, but it is padded by repeated constraint sections and an inlined multi-agent architecture that duplicates its reference. Tightening redundancy would improve token efficiency without losing clarity.
Suggestions
Merge the duplicate 注意事项 and 约束条件 sections into a single constraints block to remove the repeated 虚构/分寸/画面感/网感 entries.
Reduce the inlined 9-agent architecture to a brief overview and rely on references/full-pipeline-multi-agent.md for the detailed breakdown, since that file already exists.
Make the 标准流程 质量检查 an explicit validate→fix→retry gate (e.g. '若不达标，回到文案创作步骤修改并复检，达标后再输出') to push workflow clarity toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Noticeably verbose: 注意事项, 约束条件, and 角色设定 repeat the same constraint set (虚构/分寸/画面感/网感), and the full 9-agent architecture is inlined in SKILL.md despite a dedicated reference file — matching anchor 2. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Instruction-only but actionable: a copy-paste-ready Markdown output template, concrete numbered workflow steps, and named 使用示例 give mostly executable guidance with only minor gaps, matching anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 4-step sequence includes a 质量检查 checkpoint and the agent mode adds an explicit '如不达标返回创作阶段' retry loop; the main-flow check is softer than a hard validate-gate, so anchor 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure with well-signaled, one-level-deep references that all resolve, plus a 资源索引; however some architecture detail is inlined in the body that could live only in its reference file, keeping it at anchor 4. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |