Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, actionable specification of a three-stage pipeline with executable commands and explicit validation/retry feedback loops. The main gap is minor stage-3 detail repetition and implicit (rather than signaled) references to the bundled scripts.
Suggestions
Consolidate the stage-3 description so it appears once, with 处理规则 rule 6 pointing to the 三阶段参数 section instead of restating it.
Add an explicit pointer to the bundled scripts (e.g. "See scripts/stage3_checker.py for the verification logic") to make script references clearly signaled.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, directive bullet structure that assumes Claude's competence (no concept explanations), but stage-3 details are repeated across 处理规则 rule 6 and the 三阶段参数 section, a minor trim opportunity. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Copy-paste-ready commands ("python3 law-to-markdown/scripts/law_to_markdown.py \"input.docx\" --allow-fallback") covering txt/docx/pdf plus concrete parameters (--law-decision, --artifact-level, --skip-stage3-check) for the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The three-stage pipeline (处理规则 steps 1-6) is explicitly sequenced with validation checkpoints (Stage3-A/B) and a concrete feedback loop ("任一失败触发自动重走，最多 2 次；仍失败默认报错退出"). | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with real bundle files (scripts/law_to_markdown.py, stage3_checker.py, cn_law_normalizer.py) referenced via commands, but script references are implicit command paths rather than explicitly signaled navigation. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |