CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pop-up-book-illustration

生成3D纸艺弹出书风格插画,具备立体层次感、明亮温暖色调,适用于科技、教育、品牌展示等场景

59

Quality

67%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/pop-up-book-illustration/pop-up-book-illustration/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

77%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is well-structured and highly actionable, with a clear sequenced workflow and an explicit verification checklist, but it is somewhat redundant across sections and monolithic with no progressive disclosure to separate reference material.

Suggestions

Reduce redundancy by defining the color/texture/style attributes once and referencing them from the prompt-building blocks and examples instead of restating them.

Move the three full example prompts into a separate EXAMPLES.md and link to it from the body to introduce one-level-deep progressive disclosure.

Add an explicit regenerate/adjust feedback loop to 步骤3 (e.g. 'if a check fails, adjust the relevant prompt element and regenerate') to strengthen the recovery portion of the workflow.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is task-focused and does not over-explain basic concepts, but the same color/texture/style attributes are restated across '核心设计要素', the 步骤2 prompt-building blocks, and the three full example prompts, creating genuine redundancy that could be tightened; not quite the lean 'every token earns its place' anchor 3.

2 / 3

Actionability

As an instruction-only image-prompt skill it provides concrete, copy-paste-ready guidance: modular prompt-building blocks (基础结构, 色彩添加, 质感描述, 立体效果, 科技元素, 风格特征) and three complete example prompts, fully actionable without code.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The workflow is a clear 3-step sequence (理解场景需求 → 构建提示词 → 生成并验证) culminating in an explicit post-generation verification checklist (立体层次、色调、纸质质感、科技元素融合、细节), matching the anchor 3 'clear sequence with explicit validation steps; checklists'.

3 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The file is well-organized into sections, but it is a single monolithic document with no external references and the three verbose example prompts are inline content that could be split out; this matches 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' rather than a cleanly split, one-level-deep reference structure.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

57%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly conveys a distinctive niche (3D pop-up book paper-art illustrations) and its main action, but lacks an explicit 'Use when...' trigger and lists only one action with implied rather than explicit usage guidance.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user wants 3D pop-up book style illustrations, paper-art visuals, or layered cut-paper artwork.'

List multiple concrete actions (e.g. generate, restyle, adapt an existing image) rather than a single 'generate' action to raise specificity.

Include common user variations of the trigger terms (e.g. 'pop-up book', '立体纸艺', '折纸插画') for broader natural-keyword coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

The description names a concrete action ('生成3D纸艺弹出书风格插画') plus the domain, but lists only one action with descriptive style attributes rather than multiple distinct concrete actions, matching the 'names domain and some actions, but not comprehensive' anchor and falling short of the multi-action anchor 3.

2 / 3

Completeness

It clearly states what the skill does, but the 'when' is only implied via '适用于科技、教育、品牌展示等场景' rather than an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, which per the rubric caps completeness at 2.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

It includes relevant natural domain terms ('纸艺', '弹出书', '插画', '科技、教育、品牌展示'), but the trigger phrasing '适用于…等场景' frames suitability rather than capturing the common variations a user would actually say, so coverage is partial rather than complete.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche '3D纸艺弹出书风格插画' is highly specific and distinctive, unlikely to be triggered by other skills; the scenario list is broad but the core domain trigger is clearly differentiated.

3 / 3

Total

9

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
anbeime/skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.