CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

pop-up-book-illustration

生成3D纸艺弹出书风格插画,具备立体层次感、明亮温暖色调,适用于科技、教育、品牌展示等场景

54

Quality

60%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/pop-up-book-illustration/pop-up-book-illustration/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

67%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The content is a well-structured, actionable prompt-generation skill with clear sections, ready-to-use templates, worked examples, and a verification step. Its main weakness is repetition across design-element and prompt-building sections that inflates token count without adding new information.

Suggestions

De-duplicate the design attributes: define them once in 核心设计要素 and have 步骤2 reference them instead of restating each attribute as a separate code block.

Consider moving the three full example prompts to a separate examples file and keeping only one representative example inline to reduce length.

Tighten the 注意事项 and 适用场景 sections by merging overlapping guidance to avoid restating '明亮温暖色调' and '立体层次' multiple times.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is mostly efficient but repeats the same attributes across 色彩方案/视觉特征/效果细节 and again inside the prompt-building blocks, adding padding that could be tightened.

3 / 5

Actionability

Provides copy-paste-ready prompt template blocks and three fully worked examples covering tech, education, and brand cases; minor gap is that there are no executable commands or parameter specifics beyond prompt text.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

A clear three-step sequence (理解需求 → 构建提示词 → 生成并验证) with a verification checklist in step 3; checkpoints are mostly present with only minor gaps and no destructive/batch operations.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Single well-organized SKILL.md with clear section headers and no bundle files; structure is good though some content (full example prompts) could arguably live in a separate file, leaving minor organization gaps.

4 / 5

Total

15

/

20

Passed

Description

53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear, distinctive niche and a reasonable 'what', but it omits an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause and relies on characteristics rather than enumerated concrete actions, leaving it mid-band. Adding concrete triggers and action verbs would lift completeness and specificity.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause (e.g., '当用户需要生成具有3D立体纸艺、明亮温暖色调的弹出书风格插画时使用') to raise completeness above 3.

Replace characteristic lists with concrete action verbs (e.g., '生成、组合、调整纸艺弹出书插画') to strengthen specificity.

Include natural user-facing synonyms and scenario phrases (e.g., 'pop-up book illustration', '立体纸艺插画', '科技/教育/品牌插画') to improve trigger term coverage.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain ('3D纸艺弹出书风格插画') and a couple of concrete characteristics ('立体层次感', '明亮温暖色调'), but lists attributes rather than multiple concrete actions, so it is not comprehensive.

3 / 5

Completeness

There is a clear 'what' (generate pop-up book style illustrations) but no explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause; the '适用于...' only weakly implies 'when', capping completeness at 3 per the guideline.

3 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some relevant scenario terms ('科技、教育、品牌展示') but lacks common synonyms, file-extension-style markers, and the natural variations a user would say, so coverage is partial.

3 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche (3D paper pop-up book illustration with specific warm tones) is mostly distinct with only minor overlap risk against closely related illustration skills.

4 / 5

Total

13

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
anbeime/skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.