pop-up-book-illustration

平面设计师与内容创作者在制作科技、教育或品牌视觉物料时，一键生成融合纸质手工质感与数字科技光效的3D弹出书风格插画。自动构建多层立体层次与明亮温暖色调，让创意跃然纸上，轻松产出极具视觉冲击力的专业级插画。

Quality

68%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/pop-up-book-illustration/pop-up-book-illustration/SKILL.md

Quality

Content

75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is a well-structured, highly actionable prompt-construction guide with a clear workflow and verification checklist. Its main weaknesses are systematic repetition of the design vocabulary across sections/examples and the absence of error-recovery guidance after the verification checks.

Suggestions

Reduce repetition: have the three example prompts reference the step-2 component blocks (e.g., '基础结构 + 色彩添加 + 质感描述') instead of restating the full palette and texture terms each time.

Add a feedback loop to step 3: for each failed check, name the prompt adjustment to make (e.g., 层次不足 → strengthen '多层弹出结构，前后景深，立体阴影'; 色调偏冷 → re-emphasize '明亮温暖色调' and the warm palette).

Move the three complete example prompts into a references file (e.g., references/examples.md) to keep SKILL.md as a lean overview and reduce token cost per invocation.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The design vocabulary (palette, texture, layering terms) is legitimately novel, but it is restated three times — in '核心设计要素', again as prompt-building blocks in '步骤2', and again inside all three full example prompts. Not 2 because nothing explains concepts Claude already knows; not 4 because the systematic triple repetition could be tightened by having examples reference the component blocks.	3 / 5
Actionability	For an instruction-only prompt-construction skill, the guidance is fully executable: copy-paste-ready prompt component blocks ('3D纸艺弹出书风格插画，立体层次感，打开的书本场景…', '薄荷绿、天蓝色、珊瑚橙、奶油黄配色') plus three complete worked prompts covering the three stated use cases (tech/education/brand). Not 4 because there are no material gaps for the common cases.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clear three-step sequence (理解场景需求 → 构建提示词 → 生成并验证) with an explicit 5-point verification checklist in step 3 (立体层次/色调/纸质质感/科技元素融合/细节). Not 5 because there is no error-recovery loop — it says what to check but not which prompt terms to adjust when a check fails.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	No bundle files exist and none are referenced; the document is a single, well-sectioned file with clear headers and easy navigation. Not 5 because at ~124 lines it exceeds the 'under 50 lines, self-contained' simple-skill case, and the three full example prompts are content that could be split into a references file to slim the main body.	4 / 5
	Total	16 / 20 Passed

Description

62%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description conveys a clear, distinctive capability niche with both a what and a when, but it is padded with promotional language and its trigger vocabulary misses common synonyms like 立体书/纸艺. Tightening the fluff and broadening the natural trigger terms would raise both specificity and completeness.

Suggestions

Replace marketing filler ('一键', '轻松产出', '极具视觉冲击力', '让创意跃然纸上') with concrete capability statements such as the palette, layered structure, and style vocabulary the skill actually assembles.

Add an explicit trigger clause with natural user phrasings, e.g. 'Use when the user asks for 3D pop-up book / 立体书 / 纸艺 style illustrations…', to sharpen the when and improve trigger matching.

Include common synonyms (立体书, 纸艺, 纸雕) alongside 弹出书 so the description matches the varied ways users name this style.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain ('3D弹出书风格插画') and 1-2 concrete actions ('一键生成…插画', '自动构建多层立体层次与明亮温暖色调'), but pads them with marketing fluff like '让创意跃然纸上' and '极具视觉冲击力的专业级插画'. It is not 4 because the concrete action list is thin and partly buzzword-driven, and not 2 because the domain and actions are genuinely concrete.	3 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both what ('一键生成融合纸质手工质感与数字科技光效的3D弹出书风格插画…自动构建多层立体层次与明亮温暖色调') and when ('在制作科技、教育或品牌视觉物料时'). Not 5 because the 'when' is persona-framed and over-broad — it reads as 'any visual material in these domains' rather than a sharp trigger for pop-up/paper-style illustration requests.	4 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Contains relevant keywords ('3D弹出书风格插画', '纸质手工质感', '数字科技光效', '科技、教育或品牌视觉物料') but misses common Chinese synonyms users would naturally say, such as '立体书', '纸艺', and '纸雕'. Not 4 because those variations are frequent natural phrasings for this style, not just a few edge terms.	3 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	The niche is distinct ('弹出书' + paper handcraft texture + tech glow effects) with clear differentiators from generic illustration skills. Minor overlap risk remains because '科技、教育或品牌视觉物料' could match general design/visual-material requests. Not 5 for that residual breadth; not 3 because the core style terms are unmistakable.	4 / 5
	Total	14 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: anbeime/skill
Path: skills/pop-up-book-illustration/pop-up-book-illustration/SKILL.md
Commit: 0ca4f26

Reviewed: 2 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.