Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is well-structured with strong progressive disclosure and largely executable script guidance, but conciseness slips from duplication and the batch workflow lacks the validation checkpoints the rubric demands. Adding explicit verification loops would most improve the score.
Suggestions
Insert explicit validation checkpoints between roles and a verify-output step before final video composition (e.g. validate brand_style.json, verify audio/subtitle timing, confirm video plays) to lift workflow_clarity above the batch cap of 3.
De-duplicate the dependency block — keep it only in frontmatter or 前置准备, not both — to improve conciseness.
Make the TTS and image-generation steps concrete (named API/tool and expected output) to close the actionability gap toward 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient role-by-role guidance, but the dependency list is duplicated verbatim between frontmatter and 前置准备, and 可选分支 repeats role coverage, adding unnecessary tokens; fits 3 over 4 due to these padded sections. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready invocations for audio_processor.py, subtitle_generator.py, and roadshow_composer.py with full arguments and named outputs; minor gaps (TTS call and image generation stay abstract) keep it at 4 rather than 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear ten-role sequence exists, but this is a batch operation (15–100 pages) with only one weak validation mention (验证配置完整性) and no systematic validate-and-retry feedback loops, so the batch-operation cap holds it at 3. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is an overview with a 资源索引 that links one-level-deep to references/, scripts/, and assets/ with per-link purpose annotations, and all referenced files verified to exist, matching the score-5 anchor for clear navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |