Content
61%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a well-sequenced ten-role pipeline with genuinely executable script commands and a clean, verifiable resource index. Its weaknesses are redundancy between the workflow, collaboration, and example sections, unspecified intermediate file formats, and — most significantly for a 15-100 page batch pipeline — the complete absence of validation/verification checkpoints.
Suggestions
Add explicit validation steps between stages — e.g., verify slide image count matches the structural plan, check each script's exit status and output files exist before proceeding, and probe the final roadshow_video.mp4 (duration/resolution/audio track) — with fix-and-retry guidance.
Cut the "使用示例" section to one-line pointers or remove it; it re-describes flows already fully specified in "操作步骤" and "与其他 Skill 协同", and drop the duplicated dependency block from "前置准备".
Specify the expected formats of intermediate artifacts (roadshow_script.txt structure, brand_style.json keys, transitions.json schema) or link to the reference files that define them.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly procedural with little concept-teaching padding, but there is real redundancy: the dependency list in "前置准备" duplicates the frontmatter verbatim, the "使用示例" section re-narrates flows already specified in "操作步骤" and "与其他 Skill 协同", and the collaboration sections repeat content that the resource index points to in references/collaboration_guide.md. This is the 'could be tightened' case rather than severely padded, but it is noticeably below fully lean. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | The four script invocations (scripts/audio_processor.py, subtitle_generator.py, roadshow_composer.py, style_learner.py) are given as complete, copy-paste-ready bash commands with arguments, and all referenced files exist in the bundle. Minor gaps: the formats of intermediate artifacts (roadshow_script.txt, transitions.json, brand_style.json) are never specified, and agent roles like "视觉设计师" direct image generation only in the abstract. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The ten-role pipeline is sequenced clearly with explicit input→output chaining ("每一步输出为下一步输入") and optional branches are enumerated, which is above the level of a rough sequence. However, this is a batch operation ("支持一次性生成 15-100 页") with no validation or verification checkpoints anywhere — no check that TTS audio was produced, that image count matches the plan, or that the composed video is well-formed — and per the rubric guideline, missing validation in batch workflows caps workflow_clarity at 3. The only checkpoint is a soft "在关键节点征求反馈" with no error-recovery loop. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Good structure: the body stays an overview, and the "资源索引" clearly signals each one-level-deep reference (references/brand_style_guide.md, design-system-import-guide.md, roadshow_script_template.md, collaboration_guide.md — all verified to exist) with stated purpose, plus scripts and assets. Minor organization gaps keep it below 5: the '与其他 Skill 协同' details are inlined where the dedicated collaboration guide should carry them, and per-section inline links (e.g., the guide link inside role three's section) are somewhat buried rather than consolidated. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |