Content
53%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-organized, lean template skeleton with clear section structure and no unnecessary padding, but it offers almost no actionable content because every section is an empty placeholder. Workflow and progressive-disclosure benefit from the clean structure, while actionability is the clear weak point.
Suggestions
Replace placeholder bodies with at least one concrete, copy-paste-ready example (real step text, a real parameter table, and a real input/output pair) so the template demonstrates executable guidance, not just shape.
Add an explicit validation/verification checkpoint to the 核心逻辑 workflow (e.g., a 'validate the filled-in SKILL.md' step) to raise workflow_clarity above 3.
Provide a short completed worked example alongside the blank template so users can see the intended result and the steps become actionable.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The skeleton is lean with no over-explanation of concepts Claude already knows and no padded prose; placeholders are terse. It is not a 5 only because the placeholder tokens carry no real informational payload beyond structure. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | The body is almost entirely placeholders ('〈详细说明此步骤的逻辑〉', '〈示例输入〉', '〈示例输出〉') with no executable code or commands; it provides a structural skeleton but no specific steps a user can actually execute against a real task. | 2 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequenced skeleton is present (任务目标 → 使用方式 → 核心逻辑 步骤1/2/3 → 注意事项 → 示例), but the steps are empty placeholders with no validation checkpoints, matching the anchor for steps listed but checkpoints missing. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and the body is self-contained with well-organized, clearly headed sections and no nested references; it is not a 5 because the body is slightly over 50 lines and consists of placeholder skeleton rather than substantive overview content. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 13 / 20 Passed |