CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

wechat-hotspot-publisher

智能采集热点话题,10分制筛选优质选题,AI生成爆款内容(标题/封面/标签/图片/HTML排版),支持素材上传和草稿箱发布,一键发布到微信公众号、小红书、B站等多平台

65

Quality

77%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Critical

Do not install without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/wechat-hotspot-publisher/wechat-hotspot-publisher/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is highly actionable with concrete executable commands and well-structured, properly-signaled references to a real bundle. Its weak spots are redundancy (the same layout/color/safety rules restated several times) and missing explicit validation checkpoints in the publish workflow.

Suggestions

De-duplicate the repeated guidance (颜色规范, 封面比例, 局部划线, 草稿箱安全) — state each rule once in the workflow and remove the overlapping 注意事项 restatements.

Add explicit validation/feedback checkpoints to the publish workflow, e.g. after upload_cover verify the returned media_id before proceeding to create_draft, and check the publish API response status before declaring success.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is actionable rather than padded with basic concepts Claude already knows, but it repeats the same guidance in multiple places — color specs (lines 84 and 278), cover ratio (67-69 and 297), local-highlight rules (82-86, 277, 292-293), and draft-box safety notes (157-160, 180-183, 286-289) — so it could be meaningfully tightened.

2 / 3

Actionability

Provides fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands with explicit parameters, e.g. 'python scripts/publish_wechat.py --mode custom_api --title ... --content ... --cover ... --tags ...', JSON file format specs, and concrete filter_topics.py / search_images.py invocations.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

Steps are sequenced across 阶段一/阶段二 with numbered sub-steps, but for an outward-facing publish operation the validation checkpoints are only implicit (e.g. no automated check that the draft/media_id was returned), which caps workflow clarity at 2 per the destructive-operations guideline.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

References are one level deep, clearly signaled, and each annotated with a '何时读取' trigger (viral-content-templates.md, html-layout-guide.md, sources-config.md); all referenced paths resolve to real files in references/ and scripts/, with a organized 资源索引 for navigation.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

82%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is specific, distinctive, and rich in natural trigger terms, clearly conveying what the skill does across multiple Chinese platforms. Its main weakness is the absence of an explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause, leaving the activation condition implied rather than stated.

Suggestions

Add an explicit trigger clause, e.g. 'Use when the user wants to turn hotspot topics into publish-ready content for WeChat Official Account, Xiaohongshu, or Bilibili.'

Clarify the activation condition so Claude knows precisely when to select this skill over generic content-generation skills.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions: '智能采集热点话题', '10分制筛选优质选题', 'AI生成爆款内容(标题/封面/标签/图片/HTML排版)', '素材上传', '草稿箱发布', '一键发布到...多平台' — a comprehensive set of specific capabilities rather than vague language.

3 / 3

Completeness

It clearly answers 'what' (collect topics, score, generate content, publish to multiple platforms) but lacks any explicit 'Use when...' trigger clause; the 'when' is only implied, which caps completeness at 2 per the guidelines.

2 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Natural terms a user would say are well covered: '热点话题', '爆款内容', '微信公众号', '小红书', 'B站', '草稿箱' — these match how users actually request multi-platform Chinese content publishing.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is clear and distinctive — Chinese multi-platform (公众号/小红书/B站) hotspot-driven content publishing with draft-box mode — unlikely to trigger for unrelated skills.

3 / 3

Total

11

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
anbeime/skill
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.