Content
60%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body delivers a well-sequenced, actionable workflow with real safety gates (preview loop, user confirmation, draft-box-only publishing) and a properly organized resource index pointing to genuine bundle files. Its main weakness is heavy redundancy — layout rules, defaults, and post-publish steps are each repeated two to three times, inflating token cost without adding guidance.
Suggestions
Deduplicate the repeated material: state the HTML layout rules (colors, 20% density, 2.35:1 cover, heading levels) once and point to references/html-layout-guide.md everywhere else; the same applies to the default-platform rules and the post-publish draft-box steps.
Cut the 常见问题 section or trim it to items not already answered inline (Q2, Q3, Q4, Q6 all restate earlier content), which alone would remove ~30 lines of padding.
Add brief failure-path guidance for publishing (what a failed custom_api push looks like and what to retry) and note the credentials each of publish_xiaohongshu.py / publish_bilibili.py needs.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is noticeably padded with repeated material: the HTML layout rules (colors, 2.35:1 cover, ≤20% highlight density, heading structure) appear three times (sections 3.5/3.7, 注意事项/排版规范, and 默认模式), the post-publish draft-box instructions appear twice verbatim, the default-platform choice is restated in three places, and the 常见问题 Q&A largely restates earlier sections. This matches 'noticeably verbose; several unnecessary explanations or padded sections' rather than the 'mostly efficient with some trimming possible' anchor. | 2 / 5 |
Actionability | Guidance is mostly executable: full CLI invocations with per-flag explanations for all three publish scripts ('python scripts/publish_wechat.py --mode custom_api --title ... --content ... --cover ... --tags ...'), a concrete JSON payload format, and a 使用示例 section with copy-paste-ready commands. Minor gaps keep it below 5: placeholder content like '--content "<html>...</html>"', no example of the expected output/response for most commands, and no mention of required credentials/env vars for the xiaohongshu and bilibili scripts. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is clearly sequenced (阶段一 generation → preview/adjust loop → 阶段二 publish, plus explicit branches A/B for manual and 秀米 modes), and risky publishing is gated by real checkpoints: user confirmation before push, '安全模式：不会直接发布到线上，需要人工确认', draft-box verification after push, and the preview-until-satisfied feedback loop. Not a 5 because there is no error-recovery guidance (what to do when the custom API returns failure, token expiry, image search returns nothing beyond a one-line Q&A hint). | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Structure is good: a 资源索引 lists each script with purpose/modes and each reference with an explicit '何时读取' (when to read) signal, and all referenced paths (references/viral-content-templates.md, references/html-layout-guide.md, references/sources-config.md, scripts/*.py) exist as real one-level-deep bundle files. Below 5 because content that belongs in those reference files is inlined in SKILL.md — e.g., the color palette, highlight-density rules, and platform word counts duplicate references/html-layout-guide.md and viral-content-templates.md, and the layout spec is repeated rather than pointed to. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |