Content
100%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
This is an excellent skill that practices what it preaches — terse, precise, and actionable. The rules are specific and concrete, the examples demonstrate both good and bad patterns with realistic diffs, and the boundaries are clearly defined. The content is well-structured for a single-purpose skill with no unnecessary verbosity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Every line earns its place. No explanations of what Conventional Commits is or how git works. The rules are stated as terse directives, and the anti-patterns ('What NEVER goes in') are sharp and specific. The tone itself models the skill's purpose. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready examples with both good and bad outputs. The rules are specific enough to execute (character limits, allowed types, imperative mood verbs, bullet style). The examples show real commit messages with body formatting, issue references, and breaking change notation. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | This is a single-task skill (generate a commit message), and the workflow is unambiguous: read the diff, apply the rules, output a code block. The 'Auto-Clarity' section acts as a validation checkpoint for when body is mandatory. The 'Boundaries' section clearly scopes what the skill does and doesn't do. No destructive or batch operations are involved. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | For a standalone skill under 50 lines with no need for external references, the content is well-organized into logical sections (Rules, Examples, Auto-Clarity, Boundaries). No bundle files are needed, and the structure supports quick scanning. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |