Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is terse, concrete, and fully actionable with complete examples and an explicit clarity checkpoint for destructive/risky commit types. Structure is clean and appropriately self-contained for a simple skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient throughout — terse rules ('No fluff. Why over what.'), no explanation of what a commit or Conventional Commits is, and every line earns its place; assumes Claude's competence. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully actionable: concrete subject format, enumerated types, char limits, and two complete copy-paste-ready example messages covering the common cases (regular feature and breaking change). | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | For a single-purpose skill the action is unambiguous, and the Auto-Clarity section adds an explicit checkpoint — always include a body for breaking changes, security fixes, migrations, and reverts — giving a clear validation rule for the risky cases. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill under 50 lines with clear section headers (Rules, Examples, Auto-Clarity, Boundaries) and no need for external references; per the simple-skill guidance this scores top marks. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 20 / 20 Passed |