Content
87%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-organized, lean, actionable instruction skill whose templates and tier table make it directly usable; the only gap is the absence of an explicit verification checkpoint in the multi-step flow, which caps workflow clarity. Conciseness, actionability, and progressive disclosure are all at the top of the scale.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step before the brief is considered draft-complete — e.g. a checklist confirming the privilege-circle distribution warning was applied, coverage figures reconcile against the diligence output, and the decision items each name an owner and a deadline.
Make the tier-selection checkpoint a numbered step (e.g. "1. Confirm audience tier; ask if not obvious") so the multi-step flow reads as an explicit sequence rather than a soft inline instruction.
Specify how recurring-brief deltas are detected against the prior brief (e.g. compare finding IDs/severity against the last brief's snapshot) so 'New findings since last brief' is reproducible rather than left to interpretation.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean — templates and a tier table carry most of the weight with minimal prose, no explaining of concepts Claude already knows, and every line earns its place (e.g. "Deal leads care more about movement than state" is a useful non-obvious insight), matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor rather than the padded level 2. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Delivers copy-paste-ready markdown skeletons with concrete fields (Status, Coverage, Material findings, Decisions needed) and a progress table with exact columns, plus the five named decision-tree branches — specific and executable rather than abstract, fitting the level-3 anchor for an instruction-only skill. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | The sequence is clear — tier selection ("Ask which tier if not obvious"), matching summary template, deltas for recurring briefs, decision tree — but there is no explicit validation/verification checkpoint in the flow, so it sits at level 2 ('sequence present but checkpoints missing') rather than the level-3 'explicit validation steps' anchor; it is not level 1 because steps are well-sequenced and the tier-conditional logic is explicit. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, but the self-contained body is cleanly sectioned (Purpose, Load context, Audience tiers, The summary, Deltas, Handoffs, What this skill does not do) and external config references (CLAUDE.md, deal-context.md) are one-level-deep and fully pathed, matching the 'clear overview with well-signaled references; easy navigation' anchor. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |