Conciseness

The body is extremely lean with no padding and no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; every line (load reference, run Mode 4, warn on open sources, mark output privileged) earns its place.

Actionability

Provides concrete steps and specific behaviors ('Load the `internal-investigation` reference skill and run Mode 4', 'show what changed before rewriting'), but the substantive work is delegated to a reference skill rather than fully self-contained instructions, sitting between anchors 2 and 3.

Workflow Clarity

Numbered steps with conditional branches (first-time vs update) and checkpoints ('warn if high-priority sources are still open') give a clear sequence, but validation is warning-oriented rather than hard feedback loops, placing it just below the top anchor.

Progressive Disclosure

Under 50 lines with a single task and no bundle files; sections are well-organized and the one-level-deep pointer to the `internal-investigation` reference skill is clearly signaled via the closing blockquote, matching the simple-skill allowance for a top score.

Specificity

Names two concrete actions ('Draft or update the privileged investigation memo from the investigation log'), but these are two forms of a single task rather than multiple distinct capabilities, sitting between anchors 2 and 3.

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (draft/update the privileged investigation memo) and when ('Use when an investigation is far enough along... or when new data has been added'), matching the highest anchor.

Trigger Term Quality

Includes a 'Use when...' clause with relevant terms ('investigation', 'memo'), but the trigger phrasing ('far enough along to write the first memo cut') is internal jargon rather than the broad natural keywords a user would say.

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The niche is highly specific to privileged legal investigation memos, with triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills, matching the clear-niche anchor.