Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured, highly actionable feedback skill with a clear sequenced workflow and explicit confidence discipline. Its main weakness is conciseness — the hard 'no rewriting' rule and its pedagogical rationale are repeated several times — and it stays monolithic rather than splitting detail into bundle files.
Suggestions
State the 'no rewriting' hard rule once (e.g., in Purpose) and reference it from Step 4 and 'What this skill does not do' instead of re-deriving the rationale each time; trim the motivational prose in 'Why the rule is strict'.
Consider moving the full feedback template and the tracker format into a references/ file (e.g., FEEDBACK_TEMPLATE.md) so SKILL.md stays a lean overview with one-level-deep, clearly signaled links.
Keep one canonical example-phrase policy rather than restating the 'labeled, sparingly, generic not substantive' guidance across Purpose, step 5, and the template note.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly efficient and domain-specific, but the 'no rewriting' rule is restated four or more times (Purpose, 'Why the rule is strict', Step 4, 'What this skill does not do') and motivational prose ('the point of law school writing practice is the struggle') pads beyond what the model needs — the 'could be tightened' anchor, not the lean anchor 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a copy-ready structured feedback template, concrete per-type section expectations (QP/BA/Facts/Discussion/Conclusion; TOA/Intro/SOF/Argument/Conclusion), an exact refusal script, and a tracker format — fully actionable for an instruction-only skill, satisfying the scoring note that absences of code are not penalized when guidance is concrete. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clearly sequenced 5-step workflow (read draft → identify type → structured feedback → handle rewrite request → track patterns) with an explicit VERIFY confidence-discipline checkpoint; this is not a destructive/batch operation, so the cap-at-2 rule does not apply. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | The single SKILL.md is well-sectioned and its cross-skill pointers are clearly signaled, but there are no bundle files and the inline feedback template and tracker format make it a fairly long monolithic document exceeding the under-50-line simple-skill carve-out for a top score. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |