Content
70%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A concise, well-organized instruction skill that assumes Claude's competence and avoids redundant concept explanations. It loses points on actionability (the register-entry format is left to another agent) and workflow clarity (file writes lack a validation/verification checkpoint).
Suggestions
Add a validation step after writing the YAML register entry (e.g. re-read the file to confirm the entry parses and the computed deadline date is present), since this is a file-mutation workflow.
Specify the exact register-entry format inline or via a one-level reference instead of deferring to 'the leave register format from the leave-tracker agent'.
Make the 75%-exhaustion deadline computation concrete (e.g. 'start_date + (entitlement_hours * 0.75)') rather than described.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean: it skips any explanation of what FMLA/USERRA/ADA are, jumps straight to the steps and concrete file paths, and every line earns its place without padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete file paths and a specific single-prompt question list, but the register-write step ('using the leave register format from the leave-tracker agent') is left implicit and the 75%-exhaustion computation is described rather than given as a concrete formula. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps are clearly sequenced, but the workflow writes to a YAML register (a file mutation) with no validation/verification checkpoint confirming the entry is well-formed or that the computed deadline is correct, capping clarity at 2. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and this is a short single-purpose skill; the content is well-organized into Instructions and Examples sections with no nested references, fitting the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |