Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
Highly actionable and clearly sequenced with strong verification checkpoints, but held back by redundancy across the 'NOT' sections and a monolithic structure with no reference-file split.
Suggestions
Collapse 'What this memo is NOT' and 'What this skill does NOT do' into the Purpose section — they repeat 'scaffold, not analysis; student does the thinking' verbatim.
Mention the 'the analysis is yours' framing once (in the output banner) rather than restating it in the Purpose, Step 5, and the NOT section.
Move the large output template block (lines ~116–198) into a bundled reference file (e.g. references/memo-template.md) referenced from the Workflow section to reduce inline bulk.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient and pedagogically necessary, but 'What this memo is NOT' and 'What this skill does NOT do' restate the Purpose section, and the 'the analysis is yours' motif is repeated three times; tightening the redundancy would earn a 3. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, copy-ready guidance — exact block formats with example text, exact plugin paths, verbatim pedagogy-mode label phrasing, and a full output template. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Numbered Step 1–3 workflow plus a pedagogy-check decision tree ('If no guide exists, use guide') and explicit verification checkpoints (cite verification, no-silent-supplement stop-and-ask loop). | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized with clearly signaled one-level references to external plugin resources (CLAUDE.md, guides/<practice-area>.md, /research-start), but the ~200-line body is monolithic with no bundle files and a large inline output template that could be split out. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |