Content
100%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is lean, actionable, and well-sequenced, with concrete templates and an explicit cross-check validation step for a consequential drafting task. It is appropriately self-contained with clear section organization and no nested references.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence — it never explains what a policy or jurisdiction is, and every section (scope questions, variance table, templates, checklist) earns its place — matching the score-3 'every token earns its place' anchor; the dense matter-context paragraph is operationally necessary rather than padding. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | It gives concrete executable guidance — explicit paths to load, a jurisdictional-variance lookup table, a fill-in supplement template, and a complete output template — with no vague 'process as needed' direction; per the instruction-only scoring note, the absence of code is not penalized because the guidance is actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear five-step sequence (Scope → Jurisdictional scan → Draft core → State supplements → Cross-check) with an explicit validation checkpoint in Step 5 (conflicts, over-promising, inadvertent contract) plus a 'remove before insertion' note and attorney-review handoff, providing the feedback loop the score-3 anchor requires. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist, and the single-file skill is a well-organized overview with clearly delineated sections and a one-level handoff pointer to another skill, satisfying the 'well-organized sections' basis for a self-contained skill with no nested references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 12 / 12 Passed |