Content
77%Weight 40%Scale 1-3Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a thorough, well-sequenced QA methodology with strong actionability and workflow clarity, including explicit gating checkpoints and concrete templates. Its main weaknesses are verbosity with duplicated sections and a monolithic structure that underuses progressive disclosure via bundle files.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated 'Inputs accepted' section (it appears near both the header and the Purpose section) and consolidate overlapping Notes/Purpose prose to cut roughly 10-15% of the body.
Extract the detailed 13-parameter definitions and the 10-category injection-scan catalog into reference files under references/ (e.g. design-parameters.md and injection-scan.md), leaving SKILL.md as a concise overview that links one level deep.
Move the full verdict-tier definitions and the REFUSE output template into a verdicts.md reference so the main body stays lean while preserving the copy-pasteable refusal text.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is accurate and domain-specific (not explaining concepts Claude already knows), but at ~685 lines it is verbose with real redundancy — 'Inputs accepted' appears twice (lines 17-22 and 52-60), the Notes and Purpose sections overlap, and the REFUSE blockquote is written out and then re-explained. Not the lowest anchor because the content is substantive rather than padded filler, but it could be tightened considerably. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, specific, actionable guidance: ten enumerated injection-scan categories each with exact phrases to flag, explicit 'Flag 🔴/⚠️/🟡 if' criteria per parameter, and a copy-pasteable output template with a parameter table. As an instruction-only skill the absence of code is not penalized because the guidance is fully actionable. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced workflow (Step 1 → 1.5 → 2 → 2.5 → 3 → 4 → 5) with explicit gating checkpoints — the injection scan forces verdict downgrades and unaddressed legal failure modes force Material Concerns — plus checklists for the 13 parameters, the 10 scan categories, and the legal failure mode checkboxes. The destructive/batch cap does not apply to this QA skill. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Sections are clearly organized, but the skill is a single ~685-line monolithic file with no references/, scripts/, or assets/ bundle files; content that could be split out (detailed parameter explanations, the full injection-scan catalog, the output template) is inline. Matches the 'some structure but content that should be separate is inline' anchor rather than the top anchor requiring well-signaled one-level-deep references. | 2 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |