Content
72%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a concise, well-structured report-generation template with a clear 8-step sequence. It loses points on actionability and workflow clarity because the table templates are empty and there are no explicit validation checkpoints before distribution.
Suggestions
Add a brief data-gathering or validation checkpoint (e.g., confirm all account balances and benchmark data are present before populating tables, and verify totals reconcile) so the workflow has an explicit feedback step.
Populate at least one table with a worked example row so the template is copy-paste-ready rather than empty headers, improving actionability.
Add a short pre-distribution compliance checklist with concrete steps (who approves, what to verify) rather than the single-line 'Review for compliance approval' note.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and well-organized — uses table templates and terse step descriptions with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, so every token earns its place. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete structure (named sections, page ranges, table templates) but the tables are empty headers and there is no executable, copy-paste-ready guidance, falling short of the score-3 'fully executable' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Steps 1–8 are clearly sequenced with a report-structure checklist, but there are no explicit validation checkpoints before distribution beyond a one-line compliance note, matching the score-2 'sequence present but checkpoints missing' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are needed; content is organized into clearly headed sections appropriate for an overview skill, satisfying the score-3 allowance for skills with no external references. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 10 / 12 Passed |