Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, mostly lean report-generation spec with concrete table schemas and a clear page-by-page structure. Its main weakness is workflow validation: report generation is a batch operation, yet compliance/verification checkpoints are only implicit rather than explicit workflow steps.
Suggestions
Add an explicit verification step to the workflow (e.g., Step 9: validate that figures reconcile, confirm net-of-fee calculation, and obtain compliance sign-off before distribution) rather than burying the compliance check in 'Important Notes'.
Populate at least one table with a single worked example row so the expected output format is unambiguous, reducing the chance of malformed reports.
De-duplicate the step list: the Steps 1-8 narrative and the 9-item 'Report Structure' list cover overlapping ground — either consolidate them or clearly distinguish 'what to compute' from 'how to lay out the PDF'.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean — tables and tight bullets with no concept padding — but the fully-blank template tables and the duplicate step list (Steps 1-8 then re-listed as a 9-item Report Structure) are minor redundancy, fitting score 4 rather than the fully trimmed score 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | As an instruction-only skill it gives concrete, specific guidance — exact table column schemas, page-count specs, and a 9-item report structure — which is actionable with minor gaps (e.g., how returns are actually calculated is unspecified), fitting score 4 rather than the populated-example completeness of score 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 8-step sequence exists, but validation/verification checkpoints are largely absent or implicit — the only compliance checkpoint is buried in 'Important Notes' rather than as a workflow step, and given the batch (multi-client) nature this fits the score-3 anchor of 'sequence present but checkpoints missing or implicit'. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly headed sections in a single file with no bundle references; structure is good with only minor gaps (the blank template tables could conceivably live in a reference template), fitting score 4 rather than score 5 since it exceeds the under-50-line simple-skill threshold and lacks an overview-pointing-to-references structure. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |