CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

client-review

Prepare for client review meetings with portfolio performance summary, allocation analysis, talking points, and action items. Pulls together account data into a concise meeting-ready format. Use before quarterly reviews, annual checkups, or ad-hoc client meetings. Triggers on "client review", "meeting prep for [client]", "quarterly review", "prep for [client name]", or "client meeting".

69

Quality

87%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide
SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

81%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured, token-efficient prep checklist with concrete templates and a clear workflow. The main weakness is the absence of explicit validation/feedback loops for the recommendation and action-item steps, which keeps workflow_clarity from a top score.

Suggestions

Add an explicit validation/review checkpoint before finalizing action items (e.g., 'Confirm each action item has an owner and a due date before output').

Provide a worked example or populated sample of the performance/allocation tables to make the templates fully actionable rather than blank.

Tie the proactive recommendations to explicit decision criteria (e.g., the exact rebalancing threshold check) so the recommend step has a concrete validation loop.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean and efficient; assumes Claude's competence with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows (e.g., no preamble about what portfolio performance is). Tables and bullet lists keep every token earning its place.

5 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete, structured guidance (performance table with specific metrics, allocation drift thresholds 'typically 3-5%', timed agenda) but leans on blank template tables and qualitative prompts rather than fully executable commands, leaving minor gaps.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

Clear six-step sequence with named steps and most checkpoints present (e.g., 'Flag any drift exceeding the IPS rebalancing threshold'), but lacks explicit validation/feedback loops for the recommended batch-adjacent actions like rebalancing trades; minor validation gaps keep it below 5.

4 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Well-organized single-file overview with clear section headers and a coherent structure; no bundle files exist so content is appropriately self-contained, with only minor organization gaps (e.g., 'Important Notes' could be more tightly integrated).

4 / 5

Total

17

/

20

Passed

Description

88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong description that clearly states what the skill does, when to use it, and provides multiple natural trigger phrases. It uses proper third-person voice and is comprehensive without being padded.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain and lists several concrete actions ('portfolio performance summary, allocation analysis, talking points, and action items', 'Pulls together account data into a concise meeting-ready format'), with minor gaps in coverage rather than comprehensive enumeration.

4 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers both what (prepare for client review meetings with portfolio performance summary, allocation analysis, talking points, action items) and when ('Use before quarterly reviews, annual checkups, or ad-hoc client meetings') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Comprehensive natural trigger phrases including synonyms and bracketed variable forms ('client review', 'meeting prep for [client]', 'quarterly review', 'prep for [client name]', 'client meeting') that a user would naturally say.

5 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

Clear niche (client review meeting prep for financial advisors) with distinct triggers unlikely to fire for unrelated skills; minimal conflict risk.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
anthropics/financial-services
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.