dd-meeting-prep

Prepare for due diligence meetings — management presentations, expert network calls, customer references, and advisor sessions. Generates targeted question lists, benchmarks to reference, and red flags to probe. Use before any diligence meeting or call. Triggers on "prep for management meeting", "diligence call prep", "expert call questions", "customer reference questions", or "meeting prep for [company]".

Quality

91%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

Quality

Content

82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A focused, actionable diligence-meeting-prep workflow with concrete question templates and a clear output spec. It is efficient and well-structured, with only minor room to trim question volume and add explicit verification checkpoints.

Suggestions

Add a light validation step (e.g., 'Confirm the question list covers every stated key concern and star the must-asks before finalizing') to give the workflow an explicit checkpoint.

Consider externalizing the per-meeting-type question banks into reference files (e.g., references/management-questions.md) so SKILL.md stays a lean overview, lifting progressive disclosure toward the top anchor.

Trim a few of the lower-value warm-up questions to tighten the inline question lists and improve token efficiency.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Conciseness	The body is lean and avoids explaining concepts Claude already knows (no primer on what a CIM or diligence is), but the ~60 inline example questions across meeting types are substantial enough to be slightly trimmed; it sits just below the fully-lean anchor.	4 / 5
Actionability	Provides copy-paste-ready question templates per meeting type plus a concrete six-part output spec and prioritization rules ('star the must-asks', '15-20 max'), covering the common cases fully for an instruction-only skill.	5 / 5
Workflow Clarity	A clean five-step sequence (context → questions → benchmarks → red flags → output) with a checklist-style output spec, but it lacks explicit validation/feedback checkpoints; the destructive/batch cap does not apply since this is generative work.	4 / 5
Progressive Disclosure	Well-organized with clear section headers and no nested references, and no bundle files are present; at ~100 lines the per-meeting-type question banks could be externalized into reference files, leaving minor organization gaps rather than a fully-split structure.	4 / 5
	Total	17 / 20 Passed

Description

100%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A well-crafted description that clearly states capabilities, usage timing, and concrete trigger phrases in third-person voice. It matches the strongest reference examples in the rubric.

Dimension	Reasoning	Score
Specificity	Names the domain (due diligence meetings) and lists multiple concrete deliverables — 'Generates targeted question lists, benchmarks to reference, and red flags to probe' — plus enumerates five meeting subtypes, giving comprehensive coverage.	5 / 5
Completeness	Explicitly answers both 'what' (prepare for diligence meetings; generate question lists, benchmarks, red flags) and 'when' ('Use before any diligence meeting or call' with concrete trigger phrases).	5 / 5
Trigger Term Quality	Includes natural phrases a user would actually say — 'prep for management meeting', 'diligence call prep', 'expert call questions', 'customer reference questions', 'meeting prep for [company]' — covering multiple synonyms and entry points.	5 / 5
Distinctiveness Conflict Risk	Occupies a clear niche (diligence meeting prep) with highly specific triggers, making overlap with unrelated skills minimal; third-person voice is correctly used throughout.	5 / 5
	Total	20 / 20 Passed

Validation

100%

Warnings & errors only

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation — 16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository: anthropics/financial-services
Path: plugins/vertical-plugins/private-equity/skills/dd-meeting-prep/SKILL.md
Commit: 3865222

Reviewed: 9 days ago

Table of Contents

Discovery Implementation Validation

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.