Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A tight, well-structured instruction-only skill that assumes Claude's competence and gives concrete extraction/screening/output structure. Adding a short worked example of a finished screening memo would push actionability to full marks.
Suggestions
Include a brief filled-in example screening memo (a few lines) so the expected output format is unambiguous.
Add an explicit verification step before Step 4 output (e.g., 'Confirm every Pass/Fail cell is filled and financials are internally consistent') to strengthen workflow checkpoints.
Optionally name a standard output location or filename convention for the one-page memo so the deliverable is concrete.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and efficient — tight field lists, a compact screening table, and a direct notes section with no padding or explanation of finance concepts Claude already knows; every token earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Highly actionable instruction-only guidance with exact extraction fields, a specific screening-criteria table, and a fixed 3-part assessment structure, but lacks a worked example of a completed screening memo to fully anchor the output. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Four steps are clearly sequenced (Extract → Screen → Assess → Output) with flagging guidance ('If financials seem inconsistent... flag it explicitly', ask for criteria upfront); minor validation gaps but the task is non-destructive so no hard cap applies. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines, single-purpose, with well-organized sections (Workflow / Steps 1–4 / Important Notes) and no need for external references; no bundle files exist to evaluate, so the simple-skill exception applies. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |