CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

fx-carry-trade

Evaluate FX carry trade opportunities by combining spot rates, forward points, interest rate differentials, volatility surface analysis, and historical price trends. Use when analyzing carry trades, comparing FX forward curves, assessing carry-to-vol ratios, or evaluating currency pair opportunities.

70

Quality

86%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No findings from the security scan

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

72%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

The body is lean and well-organized with a clear 6-step tool-chaining workflow and a self-contained structure that needs no external references. It loses points on actionability (the central carry-annualization formula is never stated and output tables use placeholders) and workflow clarity (no explicit validation checkpoints).

Suggestions

State the explicit formula for annualizing carry from forward points (e.g., carry = (spot - outright forward) / spot, annualized), since 'compute annualized carry' is referenced repeatedly but never defined.

Fill the Output Format tables with a worked example currency pair instead of '...' placeholders so the expected output is concrete and copy-paste ready.

Add an explicit validation checkpoint in the workflow, e.g., confirm the forward points and vol surface share the target tenor before computing carry-to-vol, or cross-check that the implied rate differential approximates the forward-implied carry.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The body is lean: terse tool descriptions and a tight 6-step workflow with no generic padding or library recommendations. The 'Core Principles' framing (carry-to-vol ratio, short-vol nature) is specialized domain knowledge, not concepts Claude already knows.

3 / 3

Actionability

Tool routing is concrete (specific tool calls and extractions like 'extract ATM vol, 25-delta risk reversal, butterfly'), but 'compute annualized carry from forward points' is referenced repeatedly without the actual formula, and the output tables use '...' placeholders instead of a worked example.

2 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The 6-step tool-chaining sequence is clearly ordered (spot → forward → curve → vol → historical → synthesize), but there are no explicit validation checkpoints or feedback loops, leaving checkpoints implicit rather than stated.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

A single self-contained SKILL.md (~46 lines) with well-organized sections (Core Principles, Available MCP Tools, Tool Chaining Workflow, Output Format) and no bundle files; the under-50-line rule grants a 3 for clear organization.

3 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

100%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description clearly states what the skill does (evaluate FX carry trade opportunities via specific data inputs) and when to use it, in third-person voice with multiple concrete actions, natural domain trigger terms, and low conflict risk.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

'combining spot rates, forward points, interest rate differentials, volatility surface analysis, and historical price trends' lists multiple specific concrete inputs and actions, matching the multi-action anchor rather than the partial-coverage anchor.

3 / 3

Completeness

It explicitly answers both what ('Evaluate FX carry trade opportunities by combining...') and when (an explicit 'Use when...' clause), satisfying the both-what-and-when anchor.

3 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

'analyzing carry trades, comparing FX forward curves, assessing carry-to-vol ratios, or evaluating currency pair opportunities' provides good coverage of natural domain terms a finance user would actually say.

3 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The FX carry trade niche is narrow with distinct, domain-specific triggers that are unlikely to conflict with other skills.

3 / 3

Total

12

/

12

Passed

Validation

100%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation16 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

No warnings or errors.

Repository
anthropics/financial-services
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.