Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is concise, well-structured, and gives an executable code skeleton with a precise output contract. The main gap is a stubbed body-content section and the absence of a post-save verification step, both minor for a simple file-producing skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean, assumes Claude knows python-pptx and PowerPoint concepts, and contains no padded explanations; every section (output contract, code, conventions, when-not-to-use) earns its place, matching the 'lean and efficient' anchor. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a mostly executable python-pptx script with exact paths and imports, but the body-content portion is stubbed ('# ... add tables / charts / text boxes ...'), leaving a minor gap versus fully copy-paste-ready coverage of common cases. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear sequence is laid out (write script -> run with Bash -> save to ./out/ -> return relative path) with only a minor validation gap (no post-save verify step); the destructive/batch cap does not apply because this writes one new file to a fresh path rather than overwriting or batch-processing. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external references, yet is organized into clear headed sections (Output contract, How to build, Conventions, When NOT to use), satisfying the simple-skill exception for a top score. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |