Content
68%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, mostly lean instruction-only audit skill with a useful output template and concrete criterion thresholds. Its main weakness is workflow clarity: the testing sequence lacks explicit validation or verification checkpoints, and the large inline report template is borderline content that could be split into a reference file.
Suggestions
Add an explicit validation/verification step to the Testing Approach (e.g., 'Re-check each finding against the cited WCAG criterion before reporting' and a 'Confirm no false positives from the automated scan' checkpoint) to lift workflow_clarity above 3.
Consider moving the full Output report template into a references/ file (e.g. REPORT_TEMPLATE.md) and keeping only a short example inline, to improve progressive_disclosure and reduce token weight.
Trim the WCAG 2.1 AA Quick Reference to only the criteria with non-obvious numeric thresholds, since Claude already knows the standard's general structure.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is mostly lean reference material (criterion list with concrete thresholds like 4.5:1 and 44x44, a compact testing approach, and a reusable output template) rather than padded explanation, though the WCAG quick reference restates some knowledge Claude already has, keeping it just below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete 5-step testing approach and a copy-paste-ready output template with severity-tagged findings tables, which is actionable guidance for an instruction-only skill, but the testing steps are high-level techniques rather than detailed how-to, so it is not fully 5. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Testing Approach lists a sequenced set of techniques (automated scan, keyboard, screen reader, contrast, zoom) but has no validation or verification checkpoints (e.g., confirm findings before reporting), matching the 3 anchor for steps-present-but-checkpoints-missing; the destructive/batch cap is not triggered since this is a read-only audit. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clearly labeled sections (Usage, Quick Reference, Common Issues, Testing Approach, Output, Connectors, Tips) with a clearly signaled one-level external reference to CONNECTORS.md, but the body is over 50 lines and inlines a large output template that could arguably live in a separate file, so it does not reach the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |