Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The content is a compact, well-structured instruction skill that pairs a concrete critique framework with a ready-to-use output template and clear sequencing. The main limitation is the abstract, guidance-heavy style leaves a few minor actionability and conciseness gaps rather than being fully crisp.
Suggestions
Replace the abstract connector-instruction lines ("If a Figma URL is provided, pull the design from Figma...") with a concrete, ordered input-handling step so the workflow is unambiguous.
Tighten the "How to Give Feedback" and "Tips" sections, which partly restate the framework already implied by the critique dimensions.
Resolve the malformed "If **~~design tool** is connected" markers, which read as broken placeholder syntax and undercut actionability.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is well-organized with lean section headers and a tight critique framework, with only minor instances of guidance that could be trimmed, fitting the efficient-but-slightly-tightenable anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | It provides a concrete multi-dimension critique framework and a copy-paste-ready output template with specific examples (e.g. "The CTA competes with the navigation"), giving mostly executable guidance with minor gaps typical of an instruction skill. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The flow is clearly sequenced (gather design/context/focus, run the five critique dimensions, produce the structured output) with most checkpoints implied; it is a non-destructive single-purpose skill so no explicit validation loop is required. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is compact with well-organized sections and no need for external references, meeting the simple-skill exception that allows a top progressive-disclosure score on structure alone. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |