Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured with clear workflows, validation checkpoints, and well-signaled one-level-deep references, with only mild verbosity in the recommendation-strategy prose.
Suggestions
Tighten the "Present and recommend" and "Scoping" sections — the strategy rationale (e.g. "Simple properties build momentum...") can be condensed without losing the decision rule.
Reference references/multi-test-directories.md from the body or the Reference Files table, since it exists as a bundle file but is not currently discoverable from the skill.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Most content is novel domain guidance Claude would not know (paths, prefixes, assertion types), but the "Present and recommend" and "Scoping" strategy prose is wordy and could be tightened. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides concrete executable guidance throughout: exact paths (antithesis/test/, /opt/antithesis/test/v1/{name}/), enumerated command prefixes, assertion types, and specific commands (snouty validate, snouty launch, snouty docs). | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | Two clearly numbered workflows with "DO NOT PROCEED" prerequisite gates, a snouty validate checkpoint, triage-to-iteration feedback loop, and a Self-Review checklist. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clear Reference Files table maps each reference to "When to read", references are one level deep, all referenced files exist, and the body acts as an overview pointing into them. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |