CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

compile

Build SkyWalking OAP server, run javadoc checks, and verify checkstyle. Use to validate changes before submitting a PR.

63

Quality

75%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

No eval scenarios have been run

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./.claude/skills/compile/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Compile & Verify

Build the project and run static checks matching CI.

Prerequisites

  • JDK 11, 17, or 21 (LTS versions)
  • Maven 3.6+ (use ./mvnw wrapper)

Maven profiles

  • backend (default): Builds OAP server modules
  • ui (default): Builds web application
  • dist (default): Creates distribution packages
  • all: Builds everything including submodule initialization

Commands by argument

all or no argument — full CI build

./mvnw clean flatten:flatten install javadoc:javadoc -B -q -Pall \
  -Dmaven.test.skip \
  -Dcheckstyle.skip \
  -Dgpg.skip

backend — backend only (faster)

./mvnw clean flatten:flatten package -Pbackend,dist -Dmaven.test.skip

javadoc — javadoc check only

Javadoc requires delombok output, so install must run first:

./mvnw clean flatten:flatten install javadoc:javadoc -B -q -Pall \
  -Dmaven.test.skip \
  -Dcheckstyle.skip \
  -Dgpg.skip

Running javadoc:javadoc alone without install will miss errors because ${delombok.output.dir} won't be populated.

checkstyle — checkstyle only

./mvnw -B -q clean flatten:flatten checkstyle:check

Module name — single module build

./mvnw clean flatten:flatten package -pl oap-server/analyzer/<module-name> -Dmaven.test.skip

Reading javadoc output

Maven prefixes all javadoc output with [ERROR], but the actual severity is in the message after the line number. Only lines containing error: fail the build; lines with warning: do not.

[ERROR] Foo.java:42: error: bad use of '>'        ← ACTUAL ERROR (must fix)
[ERROR] Foo.java:50: warning: no @param for <T>   ← WARNING (does not fail build)

Common javadoc errors

ErrorCauseFix
bad use of '>'Bare > in javadoc HTML (e.g., -> in <pre> blocks)Use {@code ->} or -&gt;
heading out of sequenceHeading level skips the expected hierarchySee heading rules below
reference not found{@link Foo#bar()} with wrong signatureMatch exact parameter types: {@link Foo#bar(ArgType)}

Javadoc heading rules (JDK 13+)

Strict heading validation was introduced in JDK 13. JDK 11 does not enforce it, but JDK 17/21/25 do. Write headings correctly for forward compatibility:

Javadoc locationStart heading at
Class, interface, enum, package, module<h2>
Constructor, method, field<h4>
Standalone HTML files (doc-files/)<h1>

The generated javadoc page uses <h1> for the class name and <h3> for member sections (Methods, Fields, etc.), so class-level subsections must use <h2> and method-level subsections must use <h4> to maintain proper nesting.

CI reference

CI uses JDK 11 on Linux. The dist-tar job runs:

./mvnw clean flatten:flatten install javadoc:javadoc -B -q -Pall \
  -Dmaven.test.skip \
  -Dcheckstyle.skip \
  -Dgpg.skip

The code-style job runs:

./mvnw -B -q clean flatten:flatten checkstyle:check
Repository
apache/skywalking
Last updated
Created

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.