Content
88%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a strong, focused treatment of a subtle build trap: highly actionable commands, clear scenario-based workflows, and an explicit verification feedback loop. Its only gaps are minor over-explanation in the rationale section and a single-file structure that slightly exceeds the compact-skill threshold.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean and almost entirely project-specific (Makefile prerequisites, flatten-maven mechanics) rather than generic Claude knowledge; a few prose passages in 'Why this matters' could be tightened, keeping it just below the 5 anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable, copy-paste-ready commands for every scenario ('make docker', './mvnw -pl apm-dist -am -o clean flatten:flatten package -Pbackend,dist ...', 'docker cp ... && jar -xf ... && grep ...'), covering the common cases concretely. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear per-scenario sequencing with an explicit verification checkpoint and a real feedback loop ('If grep finds nothing, the image does not contain your fix ... Re-run with the correct chain'), plus a golden-rule checklist; the build/overwrite operation has validation so the destructive cap does not apply. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized single-file skill with clear section headers and no nested references; the body exceeds the ~50-line simple-skill threshold, so it stops short of the 5 anchor reserved for compact or cleanly split-with-references skills. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |