Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable and well-structured with concrete examples and a repair feedback loop. Its main weaknesses are repeated content across sections and an unreferenced bundle file.
Suggestions
Consolidate the initial-state and stagger-syntax rules into one section to remove the verbatim repetition across 'Preview-only boundary', 'Hard rules', and 'Failure repair strategy'.
Either reference references/animation-prompt-cookbook.md from the body (e.g., a 'Cookbook' pointer) or remove it from the bundle so all references are discoverable.
Add an explicit validation step (e.g., run the validator / check incompatible data-anim-from='center' combos) to the main 'How to add animation' workflow before considering the task done.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly efficient with code, a checklist, and an attribute table, but the initial-state rule and dual stagger syntax recur across 'Preview-only boundary', 'Hard rules', and 'Failure repair strategy', creating avoidable redundancy. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Fully executable copy-paste HTML and JS examples, a complete attribute table, enumerated supported types, and directional examples covering the common cases. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A 30-second checklist, declarative how-to, and a numbered failure-repair strategy with check-then-fix feedback loops provide a clear sequence, though the main add-animation path lacks an explicit validation checkpoint. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear one-level reference to references/data-anim.md is well signaled, but the second bundle file references/animation-prompt-cookbook.md is never referenced from the body, leaving it orphaned. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |