Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, information-dense body that explains only what the hook enforces and gives concrete guidance for being blocked and for installation. Its weaknesses are structural rather than substantive: item 3's contract rules are packed into one unreadable sentence, the recovery loop after a block is implicit, and the README/hook-file references point outside the bundle without a clearly signaled reference location.
Suggestions
Break item 3's contract rules into a short bulleted list (or move the sentence-classification details into a reference file) instead of one run-on sentence — this would tighten conciseness and improve actionability of the most complex rule.
Add an explicit feedback step under 'What to do when it blocks', e.g. 'after fixing, attempt to stop again — the hook re-runs the suite and re-checks the contract', to close the implicit recovery loop.
Either bundle the README (contract spec) and note bin/loki-seal.js as a plugin file in a clearly labeled references section, or drop the '(see README)' inline pointer since no such file exists in the skill bundle.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is dense with non-obvious rules and explains no known concepts, but item 3 packs the full contract-parsing and sentence-classification rules into a single run-on sentence, with minor redundancy ('always blocks while any test matched to a request item fails now: failing tests never count as covered'). Not 5 because that over-packed detail could be trimmed or restructured; not 3 because there is no padding or over-explanation. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete executable guidance appears in 'Fix the production code. Do not delete, skip, xfail or weaken tests' and the install command 'claude plugin marketplace add <owner/repo or path>'. Not 5 because much of the body describes the hook's behavior rather than instructing the reader, and the 'what to do' section is brief; not 3 because the guidance given is specific and executable, not vague. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The hook's behavior is a clear numbered sequence (detect runner, block conditions, contract check, receipt) and the blocked-response path includes an escalation branch ('If a test is genuinely wrong, tell the user'). Not 5 because the recovery loop is implicit — it never says to re-attempt finishing or that the hook re-runs the suite — leaving a minor validation/feedback gap. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is well-organized into short sections (hook behavior, what to do when blocked, install) and is under 50 lines, but it cites '(see README)' and 'bin/loki-seal.js' inline — files not present in this skill bundle (no references/ directory exists) — so those pointers are not clearly signaled or verifiable. Not 5 because of that dangling reference; not 3 because structure is otherwise good and content is appropriately placed. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |