Content
63%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-sequenced, largely actionable process with genuinely non-obvious domain detail, but it is a monolithic ~340-line document with notable padding and no progressive disclosure into reference files. Validation checkpoints for the risky refresh/regeneration path are the biggest gap.
Suggestions
Move the output-format template, 'Cache Staleness & Schema Drift' guidance, and Example Session into reference files (e.g. references/output-format.md, references/cache.md) and link them from SKILL.md to cut the main body roughly in half.
Add validation checkpoints: after Step 5 verify each subagent returned a structured summary before merging, and after '--refresh' confirm user HTML comments and Quick Reference entries were preserved before overwriting warehouse.md.
Delete the duplicated 'If yes: Append the Quick Reference section…' line (SKILL.md:239) and the empty 'Relationships' placeholder section, and standardize CLI paths (use 'scripts/cli.py' consistently as in Step 3).
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly operational detail Claude would not know (dbt/gusty patterns, layer hierarchy, refresh preservation), but there is real padding: Step 8's instructions are duplicated ('If yes: Append the Quick Reference section' restates the numbered instructions), the 'Relationships' section is an empty placeholder, and the Cache Staleness/Stale Cache sections plus the full Example Session restate earlier content. Fits 'mostly efficient but could be tightened', not the 'minor trims' of level 4. | 3 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, mostly executable guidance: real INFORMATION_SCHEMA SQL, specific CLI commands, subagent prompts, and output paths. Minor gaps — command paths are inconsistent ('scripts/cli.py' in Steps 3/7 but bare 'cli.py' at line 101 and 203) and Step 4's SQL is a placeholder template. Not 5 because these aren't fully copy-paste ready. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Eight clearly sequenced steps with explicit parallelization instructions and refresh-preservation rules, but no validation checkpoints — nothing verifies subagent results were merged, the file was written, or user edits survived '--refresh' (a regeneration that could clobber user content). Fits 'clear sequence with most checkpoints; minor validation gaps'. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist; everything is inlined in one ~340-line SKILL.md. Section structure is good, but content that clearly belongs in separate reference files — the full output-format template, cache staleness/drift guidance, codebase-pattern table, and example session — is inline. Fits 'some structure but could be better organized'. | 3 / 5 |
Total | 14 / 20 Passed |