CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

sag

ElevenLabs text-to-speech with mac-style say UX.

67

3.50x
Quality

56%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

91%

3.50x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Passed

No known issues

Optimize this skill with Tessl

npx tessl skill review --optimize ./skills/sag/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Discovery

32%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description is extremely terse and reads more like a tagline than a functional skill description. While it identifies the core technology (ElevenLabs TTS) and a UX paradigm (mac-style say), it fails to list specific capabilities, lacks a 'Use when...' clause, and omits common trigger terms users would naturally use when requesting speech generation.

Suggestions

Add a 'Use when...' clause with explicit triggers, e.g., 'Use when the user asks to convert text to speech, generate audio, read text aloud, or mentions ElevenLabs, TTS, or voice synthesis.'

List specific concrete actions such as 'Converts text to speech audio using ElevenLabs API, supports voice selection, adjusts speech parameters, and saves audio output files.'

Include common natural language trigger terms like 'TTS', 'voice generation', 'read aloud', 'speak', 'audio output', and 'generate speech'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (text-to-speech) and a specific tool (ElevenLabs) with a UX reference (mac-style say), but doesn't list concrete actions like 'convert text to audio files', 'adjust voice parameters', or 'list available voices'.

2 / 3

Completeness

Provides a brief 'what' (text-to-speech with ElevenLabs) but completely lacks any 'when' clause or explicit trigger guidance. Per rubric guidelines, a missing 'Use when...' clause caps completeness at 2, and the 'what' is also quite thin, warranting a 1.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes 'text-to-speech', 'ElevenLabs', and 'say' which are relevant keywords, but misses common variations like 'TTS', 'voice generation', 'audio', 'speak', 'read aloud', or 'generate speech'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

ElevenLabs and 'mac-style say' provide some distinctiveness, but 'text-to-speech' is broad enough to potentially overlap with other TTS or audio skills. The mention of a specific API (ElevenLabs) helps but the description is too terse to clearly carve out a niche.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Implementation

79%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a well-crafted, concise skill that provides highly actionable CLI commands and model-specific details without unnecessary explanation. Its main weaknesses are the lack of validation/error-handling steps (especially for the multi-step chat voice workflow) and the absence of progressive disclosure to external references for advanced topics like full voice catalog or detailed model comparison.

Suggestions

Add a validation step to the chat voice workflow, e.g., check that the output file exists and is non-empty before including the MEDIA reference.

Consider linking to an external reference file for the full list of available voices or advanced pronunciation/normalization options rather than expanding the main skill.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The content is lean and efficient. It uses terse bullet points, avoids explaining what TTS or ElevenLabs is, and every line provides actionable information Claude wouldn't already know (CLI flags, model names, audio tags, voice IDs).

3 / 3

Actionability

Provides concrete, copy-paste-ready commands throughout (e.g., `sag "Hello there"`, `sag -v Clawd -o /tmp/voice-reply.mp3 "Your message here"`), specific model names, specific audio tags with examples, and exact environment variable names.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The chat voice response section has a clear two-step sequence (generate then include), and pronunciation fixes are ordered by priority. However, there's no validation or error handling guidance—e.g., what to do if the API key is missing, if voice generation fails, or how to verify the output file was created before referencing it.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-organized with clear sections and headers, but it's somewhat flat—the chat voice responses section and the v3 audio tags could benefit from being separated or more clearly signaled. The `sag prompting` command hint is a nice touch for discovery, but there are no references to external files for deeper content.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Validation

72%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation8 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

8

/

11

Passed

Repository
attilaczudor/Test
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.