CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

session-logs

Search and analyze your own session logs (older/parent conversations) using jq.

69

1.91x
Quality

56%

Does it follow best practices?

Impact

94%

1.91x

Average score across 3 eval scenarios

SecuritybySnyk

Risky

Do not use without reviewing

Fix and improve this skill with Tessl

tessl review fix ./skills/session-logs/SKILL.md
SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

79%

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

This is a strong, actionable skill that provides concrete, executable jq/bash commands for searching session logs. Its main strengths are conciseness and actionability—every example is copy-paste ready and no tokens are wasted on explanations Claude doesn't need. Minor weaknesses include the lack of a guided workflow for common investigation patterns and the slightly long inline query catalog that could benefit from progressive disclosure into a separate reference file.

Suggestions

Add a brief recommended workflow section (e.g., 'To investigate a prior conversation: 1. List sessions by date, 2. Identify candidate sessions, 3. Search within them') to improve workflow clarity.

Consider splitting the less common queries (daily cost summary, tool usage breakdown, count messages) into a separate QUERIES.md reference file to improve progressive disclosure.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

The skill is lean and efficient. It doesn't explain what jq is, what JSONL is, or how bash works. Every section provides directly usable information—file locations, data structure, and executable queries. No unnecessary padding.

3 / 3

Actionability

Every query is a fully executable, copy-paste-ready bash/jq command. The examples cover a comprehensive range of use cases (searching, cost analysis, message extraction, tool usage breakdown) with concrete, specific commands rather than pseudocode or vague descriptions.

3 / 3

Workflow Clarity

The skill is primarily a reference of independent queries rather than a multi-step workflow, so sequencing is less critical. However, there's no guidance on a recommended workflow for common scenarios (e.g., 'first list sessions, then narrow by date, then search within'), and no validation or error-handling steps for when queries return unexpected results or sessions are missing.

2 / 3

Progressive Disclosure

The content is well-organized with clear section headers and a logical progression from structure to queries to tips. However, with ~100 lines of query examples inline, some of the less common queries (daily cost summary, tool usage breakdown) could be split into a reference file. No bundle files exist to offload this content.

2 / 3

Total

10

/

12

Passed

Description

32%

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

The description identifies a specific niche (searching own session/conversation logs with jq) but lacks explicit trigger guidance ('Use when...') and doesn't enumerate concrete actions beyond 'search and analyze.' It would benefit from more natural user-facing keywords and a clear 'when to use' clause.

Suggestions

Add an explicit 'Use when...' clause, e.g., 'Use when the user asks about previous conversations, past sessions, chat history, or wants to query session logs.'

List more specific actions such as 'filter conversations by date, extract message content, count tokens, find specific topics across past sessions.'

Include additional natural trigger terms users might say: 'chat history', 'previous conversations', 'past sessions', 'conversation logs', 'look up what we discussed'.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Names the domain (session logs / older conversations) and a key action (search and analyze) plus the tool (jq), but doesn't list multiple concrete actions like filtering, aggregating, extracting specific fields, etc.

2 / 3

Completeness

Describes what the skill does (search and analyze session logs using jq) but has no explicit 'Use when...' clause or equivalent trigger guidance, which per the rubric should cap completeness at 2, and since the 'what' is also only moderately detailed, this lands at 1-2. Given the rubric's explicit rule that missing 'Use when' caps at 2, and the 'what' is thin, scoring at the lower end.

1 / 3

Trigger Term Quality

Includes some relevant terms like 'session logs', 'conversations', and 'jq', but misses common user phrasings such as 'chat history', 'previous sessions', 'past conversations', 'log files', or 'conversation history'.

2 / 3

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

The mention of 'session logs' and 'parent conversations' with 'jq' provides some distinctiveness, but 'search and analyze' is generic enough that it could overlap with general log analysis or data querying skills.

2 / 3

Total

7

/

12

Passed

Validation

81%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation9 / 11 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

metadata_version

'metadata.version' is missing

Warning

metadata_field

'metadata' should map string keys to string values

Warning

Total

9

/

11

Passed

Repository
attilaczudor/Test
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.