Content
85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a lean, highly actionable guide with a well-sequenced workflow, explicit verification loops, and clean single-file organization. Only minor improvements are available: show the report.md template verbatim and trim the few chatty phrases.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Sections are lean, using tables and exact commands with no explanation of concepts Claude already knows; only minor chattiness ('are your friends', 'Usability matters.') keeps it off the top anchor. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete throughout (mkdir command, severity definitions, evidence/issue-{NNN}.txt naming, echo $? / curl -w checks), but the report.md template is described rather than shown verbatim — a minor gap. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 5-step numbered sequence, each expanded, with explicit verification checkpoints: repro-retry feedback loop ('If it's flaky, note that and try to identify the conditions') and summary-count reconciliation. Not a destructive/batch operation, so no cap applies. | 5 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A self-contained, well-sectioned single file (Setup / Workflow / Guidance) with no bundle files; nothing is bulky enough to warrant splitting, so all content is appropriately placed. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |