Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is highly actionable with a clear, well-validated workflow and clean single-file organization. Its main weakness is mild verbosity in a few explanatory callouts that restate intent.
Suggestions
Tighten the 'Important' and explanatory callouts (e.g., step 1's 'you need the full picture to make good ordering and grouping decisions') to remove restated intent.
The 'Tip' on CLI aliases could be trimmed or moved to a short reference table, since 'facts --help' already documents them.
Consolidate the repeated manual-fact verification guidance (covered in both steps 4 and 5) into one place to reduce redundancy.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly actionable and focused, but several callouts re-explain intent (e.g., the 'Important' notes and 'Read and understand all facts — you need the full picture...') that could be tightened without losing clarity. | 2 / 3 |
Actionability | Concrete, copy-paste-ready commands throughout (facts list/check/edit/add) plus a worked example session leave no ambiguity about what to run. | 3 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 6-step sequence with validation checkpoints (facts check at steps 2 and 5) and explicit recovery guidance for ambiguity, impossible facts, and broken commands. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | No bundle files exist and none are referenced; the single file is well-organized into clear sections (Goal, Process, Guidelines, Example), appropriate for a cohesive workflow skill. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |