Content
82%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, highly actionable CLI skill body with clear sequenced workflows and an explicit validation feedback loop, held back only by modest verbosity in the conceptual sections and implicit rather than spelled-out error-recovery loops.
Suggestions
Tighten the conceptual sections (Core idea, Domain vocabulary) to reduce prose while keeping the concrete examples.
Make the error-recovery loop explicit after "facts check" (e.g., a numbered "if a fact fails: fix code or command, re-run check" step) to strengthen the validation feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and mostly concrete commands with examples; a few conceptual sections (Core idea, Writing good facts, Domain vocabulary) could be tightened but are domain-specific knowledge that earns its place. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides copy-paste-ready executable commands throughout ("facts ll", "facts check", "facts add \"users can sign up\" --section features/auth") covering the common cases with concrete flags and arguments. | 5 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The Agent workflows section gives clearly sequenced procedures (start, define spec, track lifecycle, maintain accuracy) with the "facts check" validation feedback loop, though error-recovery steps are implied rather than spelled out as an explicit numbered retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into clear sections with no nested references and detailed flag reference delegated to "facts <command> --help"; the single self-contained file is appropriate for a CLI skill, with only minor length that could invite splitting. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |