Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-engineered orchestrator body: it delegates detail to phase and decision-ref files, specifies state, routing, and gates in checkable terms, and handles resumability and failure fallbacks explicitly. The main costs are baroque gate-condition prose, a missing scoring-engine invocation at this level, and a Files table that under-indexes the actual bundle.
Suggestions
Add the missing bundle entries to the Files table (references/diagram/, references/handoff/, references/models/, references/output-templates/, references/phases/model-recommend/, report-shell.md, report-help-banner.md) so the index matches the actual bundle.
State (or explicitly point to where the phase files state) the uv/python command that runs scripts/scoring.py, so the deterministic engine is invocable from the overview alone.
Rewrite the Gate 2 semantics paragraph as a short bulleted decision list (condition -> resolution) to make the nested in_progress/not_applicable/engine_absent cases scannable instead of one long sentence.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense orchestration contract with no explanations of concepts Claude already knows (terse idioms like "read-merge-write", gate protocol "HANDOFF_OK / GATE_FAIL"). Not 5 because the inline Contextual-offers policy and the single-sentence Gate 2 conditions could be tightened; not 3 because there is no filler, only contract detail. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Gives exact file paths, a concrete state-file JSON example, an explicit prerequisite check ("uv --version"), per-entry-point routing, and machine-checkable gate conditions. Not 5 because the scoring engine's actual invocation command is never stated at this level (delegated to phase files), and a few conditions remain prose-only. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The backbone sequence is named, the phase gate has checkable preconditions ("phases.clarify == completed AND phases.confirm == completed"), and failure/resume handling is explicit (fallback POC from design.json on Stage 2 failure, persisting poc as in_progress before load). Not 5 because the Gate 2 paragraph packs many nested conditions into near-unparseable prose, burdening sequence comprehension. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The body is a genuine overview layer: detailed content lives in references/phases/*, references/decision-refs/*, references/runtimes/*.json and the vendored INTERPRETER.md, all indexed in a Files table with purposes and clearly signaled loads ("Load it first", "Load ... whenever target maturity is selected"). Not 5 because the Files table omits existing bundle content (references/diagram/, references/handoff/, references/models/, references/output-templates/, references/phases/model-recommend/, report-shell.md, report-help-banner.md), leaving minor navigation gaps. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |