Content
86%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured router skill: concise overview, clear decision-tree triage pointing to real one-level-deep procedure files, and a tidy external-resources list. The body delegates executable diagnostics and validation loops to the referenced procedures, which keeps actionability and workflow_clarity at 4 rather than 5.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Lean overview with no padding or explanation of concepts Claude already knows; the 'Covers ...' lines serve routing decisions rather than restating knowledge, and every line earns its place. | 5 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete failure-type decision tree with named procedure links, but the executable diagnostic commands themselves live in the referenced files rather than inline in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The triage sequence (determine failure type, then branch to a procedure) is clear and unambiguous, but validation/checkpoint loops are delegated to the reference procedures rather than surfaced in the body. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Clear overview with two well-signaled one-level-deep references (references/permission-debugging.md and references/custom-model-logging-debugging.md) that both exist as real files, plus a separate external-resources section; content is appropriately split and easy to navigate. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 18 / 20 Passed |