Content
80%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-structured routing skill: concise, actionable, with a clear match-to-sub-skill workflow and excellent progressive disclosure through verified one-level-deep references. The main gap is the absence of an explicit validation/retry checkpoint, though the operations here are advisory rather than destructive.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Mostly lean routing guidance that assumes Claude's competence and avoids explaining basic database concepts, with only minor restatement of the service catalog that could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides concrete, executable routing steps — explicit file paths like references/{sub-skill-id}.md and assets/{filename}, a lookup table of services, and named MCP tools to call — with only minor gaps in the fallback lookup ordering. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Clear sequenced routing flow with explicit re-routing on pushback and a defined fallback chain for facts not in cards; lacks an explicit validate-and-retry checkpoint but the routing decision itself is low-risk. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | A clean overview body pointing one level deep to verified reference files (references/select.md, handoff.md, report-issue.md) and on-demand asset cards, all clearly signaled in tables with easy navigation. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |