Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured router skill body that uses compact tables for routing decisions, cross-service disambiguation, and security guidance, with concrete commands and a clear sequenced workflow. Trimming repeated phrases and the run-on step 5 would push conciseness higher.
Suggestions
Tighten step 5 by splitting the long run-on sentence into sub-bullets per routing scenario, reducing token cost and improving scannability.
Consolidate the repeated 'the target skill implements it' disclaimer into a single note under Security Considerations rather than restating it after each table row.
Add an explicit validation checkpoint for the ambiguous-routing branch (e.g., 'if still ambiguous after the clarifying question, state the assumption and proceed') to strengthen workflow_clarity.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | Dense, table-driven content with no padding of concepts Claude already knows, though the repeated 'the target skill implements it' clauses and the long run-on sentence in step 5 could be trimmed. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete routing table with 'Choose when...' criteria, an executable MCP command (aws___retrieve_skill), a file path, and a specific clarifying question; minor gaps remain in edge-case routing. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear 7-step numbered sequence with explicit decision branches and a clarifying-question checkpoint; no destructive/batch operations so the cap does not apply, but there is no explicit validate-retry loop. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized into headed sections and tables with detail correctly delegated to target skills one level deep (skills/<skill>/SKILL.md); no bundle files exist, and the body is slightly too long for the simple-skill exception to reach 5. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |