Content
78%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
The body is a well-designed router: it routes every task to a real, one-level-deep reference file, gives concrete execution and region guidance, and disambiguates the tricky cases. The minor costs are slight redundancy between the overview, description, and routing notes, and the absence of any inline executable example or validation checkpoint in the body itself.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is a lean router that assumes competence — it explains no CloudFront basics and spends its tokens only on non-obvious facts ('its API calls... are made in us-east-1', 'Execute commands using the AWS MCP server when connected... Fall back to the AWS CLI otherwise'). It is not a 5 because the Overview paragraph and parts of the Routing notes repeat information already carried by the description and the routing table. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Concrete, executable guidance for a router: a goal-to-reference table ('Make CloudFront the only way to reach the origin (S3 OAC, VPC origins...) → protecting-your-origins.md'), explicit execution instructions (MCP server first, AWS CLI fallback), and the us-east-1 region rule. It is not a 5 because the body itself contains no commands or examples — everything executable lives in the references — though the routing guidance itself is specific rather than vague. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | The process is stated unambiguously ('Read the matching reference in full before acting, then follow its constraints and steps') and the Routing notes resolve the confusing pairs (viewer vs origin mTLS, protecting origins vs securing content, DNS cutover ownership). It is not a 5 because the body delegates all validation and error-recovery steps to the references and offers no checkpoint of its own, and not a 3 because the sequence and edge-case handling are explicit rather than implicit. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Exemplary progressive disclosure: a concise overview, a routing table linking each goal to one of six one-level-deep reference files (all of which exist under references/ and are self-contained per the body's own claim), plus routing notes for disambiguation. Navigation is easy and nothing that belongs in a reference is inlined. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 17 / 20 Passed |