CtrlK
BlogDocsLog inGet started
Tessl Logo

resilience-hub-failure-mode-assessment

Runs and interprets AWS Resilience Hub v2 failure mode assessments. Covers starting assessments, understanding findings (severity, categories, recommendations), triaging by achievability, working with AI-generated service functions, and resolving findings. Applies when the user wants to run an assessment, review findings, or understand failure modes, or has a specific finding and asks how to resolve, remediate, or fix it. Does not apply to initial setup (use resilience-hub-getting-started) or FIS experiments.

72

Quality

88%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

SecuritybySnyk

Low

Low-risk findings worth noting

SKILL.md
Quality
Evals
Security

Quality

Content

85%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.

A well-structured skill body that keeps the overview tight and delegates the detailed multi-step SOP to a clearly-signaled one-level-deep reference with strong validation checkpoints. The main workflow section is essentially a pointer, so the body's own actionability is slightly thinner than the bundle as a whole.

DimensionReasoningScore

Conciseness

Lean body that assumes Claude's AWS knowledge — no padding explaining what Resilience Hub is; the guardrail block on MCP-vs-local loading is justified but could be tightened slightly.

4 / 5

Actionability

Provides concrete commands in troubleshooting (`update-service-function`, `create-service-function-resources`) and specific IAM condition-key guidance, while delegating the core procedure to the referenced SOP; mostly executable with minor gaps in the body itself.

4 / 5

Workflow Clarity

The referenced assessment-workflow.md lays out a clear 9-step sequence with explicit validation checkpoints (confirm before billable run, poll until SUCCESS/FAILED, 30s/60min throttling guards, require resolution comment) and feedback loops for error recovery.

5 / 5

Progressive Disclosure

Body is a concise overview that points to a single one-level-deep, clearly-signaled reference (references/assessment-workflow.md, which exists in the bundle) for the detailed procedure; navigation is easy and content is appropriately split.

5 / 5

Total

18

/

20

Passed

Description

92%Weight 40%Scale 1-5

Based on the skill's description, can an agent find and select it at the right time? Clear, specific descriptions lead to better discovery.

A strong, specific description that clearly states capabilities, gives concrete trigger phrases for when to invoke, and draws explicit boundaries against related skills. Trigger-term coverage is good but could add a few more natural synonyms to reach the top anchor.

DimensionReasoningScore

Specificity

Lists multiple concrete actions — 'starting assessments, understanding findings (severity, categories, recommendations), triaging by achievability, working with AI-generated service functions, and resolving findings' — giving comprehensive coverage of the domain.

5 / 5

Completeness

Explicitly answers 'what' (runs/interprets failure mode assessments with enumerated sub-tasks) and 'when' ('Applies when the user wants to run an assessment, review findings... or has a specific finding and asks how to resolve, remediate, or fix it') with concrete trigger phrases.

5 / 5

Trigger Term Quality

Includes natural phrases a user would say ('run an assessment, review findings, understand failure modes') plus synonyms ('resolve, remediate, or fix it'); strong coverage though a few natural variations are absent and no file-extension triggers apply.

4 / 5

Distinctiveness Conflict Risk

A clear niche (AWS Resilience Hub v2 failure mode assessments) with an explicit negative boundary — 'Does not apply to initial setup (use resilience-hub-getting-started) or FIS experiments' — minimizing overlap with sibling skills.

5 / 5

Total

19

/

20

Passed

Validation

93%

Checks the skill against the spec for correct structure and formatting. All validation checks must pass before discovery and implementation can be scored.

Validation15 / 16 Passed

Validation for skill structure

CriteriaDescriptionResult

frontmatter_unknown_keys

Unknown frontmatter key(s) found; consider removing or moving to metadata

Warning

Total

15

/

16

Passed

Repository
aws/agent-toolkit-for-aws
Reviewed

Table of Contents

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.