Content
85%Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, concise body that points Claude at concrete API surface and guardrails; the main gap is the core code example not being fully self-contained/executable.
Suggestions
Make the Core Pattern example self-contained by showing how 'llm' is obtained (e.g. constructing the runtime/client) so it is copy-paste runnable.
Add a brief validation step to the guardrails (e.g. 'compile and run an example to confirm the call shape') to strengthen the workflow's feedback loop.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence, stating only facts, a core pattern, API surface, and guardrails without explaining C++ or runtime concepts Claude already knows. | 3 / 3 |
Actionability | Provides a concrete code example and specific API names, but the sample references an undefined 'llm' object and is not fully copy-paste runnable, fitting the 'some concrete guidance but incomplete' anchor. | 2 / 3 |
Workflow Clarity | As a simple single-purpose skill, the action is unambiguous via the 'Core Pattern' and reinforced by 'When To Use' bullets and guardrails, meeting the simple-skill allowance for a top score. | 3 / 3 |
Progressive Disclosure | Under 50 lines with no external references needed and cleanly organized into labeled sections (When To Use, Package Facts, Core Pattern, Relevant API Surface, Guardrails), satisfying the well-organized-sections criterion for simple skills. | 3 / 3 |
Total | 11 / 12 Passed |