Content
75%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A well-structured, token-efficient body with concrete code patterns and clearly signaled references to external detail files. A duplicate API entry and absent bundle files are the main minor weaknesses.
Suggestions
Remove the duplicated 'axllm::Tool' entry under Relevant API Surface.
Ensure referenced bundle files (API.md, axir-api.json, axir-capabilities.json, examples/) are actually present in the skill bundle to back the progressive-disclosure pointers.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is lean and assumes competence, with minimal over-explanation; minor trimming possible (e.g. a duplicated 'axllm::Tool' entry under Relevant API Surface). | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | Provides several concrete, mostly executable C++ snippets (axllm::s, axllm::ax, record_new, validate_signature) covering common cases, with only minor gaps in completeness. | 4 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | A clear progression from Core Pattern through More Patterns to Guardrails with a 'start from examples' entry point; this is a code-generation skill without destructive batch operations, so explicit validation checkpoints are not strictly required. | 4 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | Well-organized sections with clearly signaled one-level-deep references (API.md, axir-api.json, axir-capabilities.json, examples/, and an external URL), though no bundle files are present to confirm the referenced paths resolve. | 4 / 5 |
Total | 16 / 20 Passed |