ax-flow

This skill helps an LLM generate correct AxFlow workflow code using @ax-llm/ax. Use when the user asks about flow(), AxFlow, workflow orchestration, parallel execution, DAG workflows, conditional routing, map/reduce patterns, or multi-node AI pipelines.

Quality

83%

Does it follow best practices?

Run evals on this skill

Adds up to 20 points to the overall score

View guide

Securityby

Passed

No findings from the security scan

AxFlow Codegen Rules (@ax-llm/ax)

Name: ax-flow
Rating: 68 (1 reviews)
Author: ax-llm

Use this skill to generate AxFlow workflow code. Prefer short, modern, copyable patterns. Do not write tutorial prose unless the user explicitly asks for explanation.

Use These Defaults

Use flow() factory, not new AxFlow().
Import: import { ai, flow, f } from '@ax-llm/ax';
autoParallel: true is the default; independent executes and derives run in parallel when their metadata reads/writes are known and non-conflicting.
Node results are stored as ${nodeName}Result in state.
Always define .node() before .execute() for that node.
Use .returns() (or .r()) as the last step to lock the output type.
Use descriptive node names: documentSummarizer, not proc1.
Use descriptive field names: userInput, responseText, not text, result.

Critical Rules

Use flow() factory syntax for new code.
Node results in state follow the pattern state.${nodeName}Result.${fieldName}.
.execute() maps current state to node inputs; .map() transforms state without AI calls.
.returns() maps final state to the flow output type.
Always define nodes before executing them; reversed order throws at runtime.
Keep state flat; avoid deep nesting in .map().
Ensure loop conditions can change to avoid infinite loops.
Structure independent executes to maximize safe auto-parallelization.
Use flow<InputType, OutputType>() for typed flows.
Aliases: .n() = .node(), .nx() = .nodeExtended(), .m() = .map(), .r() = .returns().

Canonical Pattern

import { ai, flow } from '@ax-llm/ax';

const llm = ai({ name: 'openai', apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_APIKEY! });

const wf = flow<{ userInput: string }, { responseText: string }>()
  .node('testNode', 'userInput:string -> responseText:string')
  .execute('testNode', (state) => ({ userInput: state.userInput }))
  .returns((state) => ({ responseText: state.testNodeResult.responseText }));

const result = await wf.forward(llm, { userInput: 'Hello world' });
console.log(result.responseText);

Factory Options

// Basic
const wf = flow();

// With options
const wf = flow({ autoParallel: false });

// Typed
const wf = flow<InputType, OutputType>();

// Typed with options
const wf = flow<InputType, OutputType>({ autoParallel: true, batchSize: 5 });

State Evolution

State grows with each executed node. Results are stored as ${nodeName}Result:

// Initial state: { userInput: 'Hello' }
flow.execute('processor', (state) => ({ input: state.userInput }));
// State: { userInput: 'Hello', processorResult: { output: '...' } }

flow.execute('analyzer', (state) => ({ text: state.processorResult.output }));
// State: { ..., analyzerResult: { sentiment: '...', confidence: 0.8 } }

Node Definition

// String signature (creates AxGen automatically)
flow.node('processor', 'input:string -> output:string');

// Multiple outputs
flow.node('analyzer', 'text:string -> sentiment:string, confidence:number');

// Array outputs
flow.node('extractor', 'documentText:string -> entities:string[]');

// Short alias
flow.n('processor', 'input:string -> output:string');

Rich Node Contracts (String Grammar)

Node signatures accept the full extended string grammar — constraint bags, class decisions, optional fields, and nested objects (full modifier table in the ax-signature skill):

flow
  .node('triage', 'ticketText:string -> ticketClass:class "bug, billing, question", severityScore:number(min 1, max 5)')
  .node('draft', 'ticketText:string, ticketClass:string, severityScore:number -> replyText:string(max 400)')
  .node('audit', 'replyText:string -> approved:boolean, flaggedSpans:object{ spanText:string, reasonNote:string }[]');

class is output-only: a downstream node consuming the decision declares it :string.
Optional marks go on the name (note?:string), never after the type.
toString() serializes these contracts losslessly into %%ax directives, so rich contracts survive the diagram round-trip.

Extended Nodes (nx)

Add fields to a base signature without rewriting it:

import { f, flow } from '@ax-llm/ax';

// Chain-of-thought reasoning
flow.nx('reasoner', 'question:string -> answer:string', {
  prependOutputs: [
    { name: 'reasoning', type: f.internal(f.string('Step-by-step reasoning')) },
  ],
});

// Add confidence scoring
flow.nx('analyzer', 'input:string -> result:string', {
  appendOutputs: [{ name: 'confidence', type: f.number('Confidence 0-1') }],
});

// Add optional context input
flow.nx('processor', 'query:string -> response:string', {
  appendInputs: [{ name: 'context', type: f.optional(f.string('Extra context')) }],
});

Extension options: prependInputs, appendInputs, prependOutputs, appendOutputs.

Execute With Input Mapping

flow.execute('summarizer', (state) => ({ documentText: state.document }));

// With AI override (use a different model for this node)
flow.execute('processor', (state) => ({ input: state.data }), { ai: alternativeAI });

Map (State Transformation)

Use map() for data shaping without AI calls:

// Sync
flow.map((state) => ({ ...state, upperText: state.rawText.toUpperCase() }));

// Async
flow.map(async (state) => {
  const data = await fetchFromAPI(state.query);
  return { ...state, enrichedData: data };
});

// Parallel async transforms
flow.map([
  async (state) => ({ ...state, result1: await api1(state.data) }),
  async (state) => ({ ...state, result2: await api2(state.data) }),
], { parallel: true });

Returns (Final Output)

const wf = flow<{ input: string }>()
  .map((state) => ({ ...state, upper: state.input.toUpperCase(), len: state.input.length }))
  .returns((state) => ({ upper: state.upper, isLong: state.len > 20 }));

// Result is typed as { upper: string; isLong: boolean }
const result = await wf.forward(llm, { input: 'test' });

Sequential Processing

const wf = flow<{ input: string }, { finalResult: string }>()
  .node('step1', 'input:string -> intermediate:string')
  .node('step2', 'intermediate:string -> output:string')
  .execute('step1', (state) => ({ input: state.input }))
  .execute('step2', (state) => ({ intermediate: state.step1Result.intermediate }))
  .returns((state) => ({ finalResult: state.step2Result.output }));

Auto-Parallel Execution

Independent execute steps run in parallel automatically (autoParallel: true by default) when their metadata reads/writes are known and non-conflicting:

const wf = flow<{ text: string }, { combined: string }>()
  .node('sentimentAnalyzer', 'text:string -> sentiment:string')
  .node('topicExtractor', 'text:string -> topics:string[]')
  .node('entityRecognizer', 'text:string -> entities:string[]')
  // These three run in parallel (all depend only on state.text)
  .execute('sentimentAnalyzer', (state) => ({ text: state.text }))
  .execute('topicExtractor', (state) => ({ text: state.text }))
  .execute('entityRecognizer', (state) => ({ text: state.text }))
  // This waits for all three
  .returns((state) => ({
    combined: JSON.stringify({
      sentiment: state.sentimentAnalyzerResult.sentiment,
      topics: state.topicExtractorResult.topics,
      entities: state.entityRecognizerResult.entities,
    }),
  }));

// Inspect execution plan
const plan = wf.getExecutionPlan();
console.log(plan.parallelGroups, plan.maxParallelism);

Planner rules:

Independent .execute() and .derive() steps may parallelize.
.map(), .returns(), .branch(), .while(), .feedback(), and explicit .parallel() are barriers.
Branch, while, and feedback bodies still use the same planner internally.
Use autoParallel: false when you need strict sequential execution.

Disable auto-parallel:

const wf = flow({ autoParallel: false });
// or per execution:
await wf.forward(llm, input, { autoParallel: false });

Conditional Branching

const wf = flow<{ query: string; expertMode: boolean }, { response: string }>()
  .node('simple', 'query:string -> response:string')
  .node('expert', 'query:string -> response:string')
  .branch((state) => state.expertMode)
    .when(true)
      .execute('expert', (state) => ({ query: state.query }))
    .when(false)
      .execute('simple', (state) => ({ query: state.query }))
  .merge()
  .returns((state) => ({
    response: state.expertResult?.response ?? state.simpleResult?.response,
  }));

After .merge(), only the taken branch's result exists; use optional chaining (?.) on untaken branch results.

While Loops

const wf = flow<{ content: string }, { finalContent: string }>()
  .node('processor', 'content:string -> processedContent:string')
  .node('qualityChecker', 'content:string -> qualityScore:number')
  .map((state) => ({ currentContent: state.content, iteration: 0, qualityScore: 0 }))
  .while((state) => state.iteration < 3 && state.qualityScore < 0.8)
    .map((state) => ({ ...state, iteration: state.iteration + 1 }))
    .execute('processor', (state) => ({ content: state.currentContent }))
    .execute('qualityChecker', (state) => ({
      content: state.processorResult.processedContent,
    }))
    .map((state) => ({
      ...state,
      currentContent: state.processorResult.processedContent,
      qualityScore: state.qualityCheckerResult.qualityScore,
    }))
  .endWhile()
  .returns((state) => ({ finalContent: state.currentContent }));

Rules:

Every .while() needs a matching .endWhile().
Ensure the loop condition can change to avoid infinite loops.

Feedback Loops (label/feedback)

const wf = flow<{ prompt: string }, { result: string }>()
  .node('gen', 'prompt:string -> result:string, quality:number')
  .map((state) => ({ ...state, tries: 0 }))
  .label('retry')
    .map((state) => ({ ...state, tries: state.tries + 1 }))
    .execute('gen', (state) => ({ prompt: state.prompt }))
  .feedback((state) => state.genResult.quality < 0.9 && state.tries < 3, 'retry')
  .returns((state) => ({ result: state.genResult.result }));

Rules:

Define the label before referencing it in .feedback().
Always include a max-iteration guard to avoid infinite loops.

Explicit Parallel Sub-Flows

flow
  .parallel([
    (sub) => sub.execute('analyzer1', (state) => ({ text: state.input })),
    (sub) => sub.execute('analyzer2', (state) => ({ text: state.input })),
    (sub) => sub.execute('analyzer3', (state) => ({ text: state.input })),
  ])
  .merge('combinedResults', (r1, r2, r3) => ({
    a1: r1.analyzer1Result.analysis,
    a2: r2.analyzer2Result.analysis,
    a3: r3.analyzer3Result.analysis,
  }));

Derive (Batch/Array Processing)

const wf = flow<{ items: string[] }, { processed: string[] }>({ batchSize: 3 })
  .derive('processed', 'items', (item, index) => `processed-${item}-${index}`, {
    batchSize: 2,
  });

Dynamic AI Context (Multi-Model)

Route nodes to different AI providers:

const fast = ai({ name: 'openai', apiKey: '...', config: { model: 'gpt-5.4-mini' } });
const smart = ai({ name: 'anthropic', apiKey: '...' });

const wf = flow<{ text: string }, { out: string }>()
  .node('draft', 'text:string -> out:string')
  .node('refine', 'text:string -> out:string')
  .execute('draft', (state) => ({ text: state.text }), { ai: fast })
  .execute('refine', (state) => ({ text: state.draftResult.out }), { ai: smart })
  .returns((state) => ({ out: state.refineResult.out }));

Description and toFunction

const wf = flow<{ userQuestion: string }, { responseText: string }>()
  .node('qa', 'userQuestion:string -> responseText:string')
  .execute('qa', (state) => ({ userQuestion: state.userQuestion }))
  .returns((state) => ({ responseText: state.qaResult.responseText }))
  .description('Question Answerer', 'Answers user questions concisely.');

const fn = wf.toFunction();
// fn.name, fn.parameters (JSON Schema), fn.func

Instrumentation (Tracing)

import { ai, flow } from '@ax-llm/ax';
import { context, trace } from '@opentelemetry/api';

const tracer = trace.getTracer('axflow');
const llm = ai({ name: 'openai', apiKey: '...' });

const wf = flow<{ userQuestion: string }>()
  .node('summarizer', 'documentText:string -> summaryText:string')
  .execute('summarizer', (s) => ({ documentText: s.userQuestion }))
  .returns((s) => ({ answer: s.summarizerResult.summaryText }));

const result = await wf.forward(llm, { userQuestion: 'hi' }, {
  tracer,
  traceContext: context.active(),
});

Flow tracing also respects live app-wide defaults:

import { axGlobals } from '@ax-llm/ax';
import { metrics } from '@opentelemetry/api';

axGlobals.tracer = tracer;
axGlobals.meter = metrics.getMeter('axflow');

const result = await wf.forward(llm, { userQuestion: 'hi' });

Rules:

wf.forward(..., { tracer, meter }) overrides flow defaults and axGlobals.
Constructor/factory flow defaults override axGlobals.
If no local tracer or meter is provided, AxFlow reads current axGlobals.tracer and axGlobals.meter, creates a parent flow span, and propagates tracer/meter plus trace context to node forwards.
axGlobals.abortSignal is merged with flow-level abort signals.

Program IDs and Demos

const wf = flow<{ input: string }>()
  .node('summarizer', 'text:string -> summary:string')
  .node('classifier', 'text:string -> category:string');

// Discover program IDs
console.log(wf.namedPrograms());
// [{ id: 'root.summarizer', ... }, { id: 'root.classifier', ... }]

// Set demos (TypeScript catches typos)
wf.setDemos([{ programId: 'root.summarizer', traces: [] }]);

// Apply optimization
wf.applyOptimization(optimizedProgram);

For tuning a flow, use top-level optimize(wf, train, metric, options) from the ax-gepa skill. There is no separate flow.optimize(...) helper.

Chat Logs

AxFlow.getChatLog() returns a flat readonly AxChatLogEntry[] after forward(). Each child-node entry is tagged with entry.name so callers can filter by node:

const log = wf.getChatLog();
for (const entry of log) {
  console.log(entry.name, entry.model);
}

Error Handling

try {
  const result = await wf.forward(llm, input);
} catch (error) {
  console.error('Flow execution failed:', error);
}

Common errors:

"Node 'x' not found" -- define .node() before .execute().
"endWhile() without matching while()" -- every .while() needs .endWhile().
"when() without matching branch()" -- .when() must be inside .branch()/.merge().
"merge() without matching branch()" -- every .branch() needs .merge().
"Label 'x' not found" -- define .label() before .feedback() references it.

Native MCP/UCP

Use ax-mcp for MCP client construction, transport/authentication policy, subscriptions, tasks, event routing, and replay. This section covers how Flow inherits and coordinates the resulting live execution context.

Set mcp/ucp on the flow or a node. Sequential nodes reuse sessions; parallel nodes multiplex through each client's concurrency policy. Branch cancellation and flow aborts propagate to outstanding requests and newly created remote tasks. Structured protocol values stay structured in flow state.

const wf = flow({ mcp: [inventory], ucp: [merchant] })
  .node('lookup', lookupProgram)
  .node('checkout', checkoutProgram, { mcpInheritance: ['merchant'] });

Mermaid Source (Author or Serialize Flows)

A whole flow can be written as (or exported to) a mermaid flowchart. Pass the diagram string straight to flow() — a string argument compiles the AxFlow mermaid dialect into a runnable flow (an options object still constructs an empty builder). String(wf) / wf.toString() renders any flow back, so flow(String(wf)) round-trips.

import { flow } from '@ax-llm/ax';

const wf = flow<{ documentText: string }, { finalReport: string }>(`
flowchart TD
  %%ax summarize: documentText:string -> summaryText:string(max 500)
  %%ax check: summaryText:string -> verdict:class "pass, fail", note?:string
  %%ax format: summaryText:string, note?:string -> finalReport:string

  summarize[Summarize document] --> check{verdict}
  check -->|pass| format
  check -->|fail, max 3| summarize
`);

const { finalReport } = await wf.forward(llm, { documentText });
console.log(String(wf)); // render back to the same dialect

Dialect:

%%ax nodeId: <signature> comment directives carry node contracts (mermaid renderers ignore them); the full string-signature grammar applies (? optional on the name, constraint bags, object{ ... }).
Data auto-wires by field name: each node input binds to the nearest upstream node that outputs that field; a field no node produces becomes a flow input.
A diamond nodeId{field} names a class decision; its labeled out-edges (-->|pass|) become branches. A back-edge is a loop: -->|label, max N| is feedback, -->|while cond, max N| is a while loop.

Render options and bindings:

wf.toString({ direction: 'LR' }) when you need render options; bare String(wf) uses defaults (flowchart TD).
bindings supplies closures the dialect can't inline: { nodes: { normalize: (s) => ({...}) }, conditions: { keepGoing: (s) => ... } } for map steps and while conditions.

Flow Gallery

Every diagram below compiles with flow(text) as written (the while loop additionally needs its conditions binding).

Linear pipeline — three nodes auto-wired by field name:

flowchart TD
  %%ax extract: contractText:string -> parties:string[], effectiveDate?:string(format date)
  %%ax summarize: contractText:string, parties:string[] -> summaryText:string(max 300)
  %%ax redline: summaryText:string -> riskNotes:string(item "one risk")[]

  extract --> summarize --> redline

Decision branch — a class diamond routes to per-branch responders, then re-joins:

flowchart TD
  %%ax classify: requestText:string -> routeClass:class "support, sales"
  %%ax supportReply: requestText:string -> replyText:string(max 300)
  %%ax salesReply: requestText:string -> replyText:string(max 300)
  %%ax send: replyText:string -> deliveredReply:string

  classify{routeClass}
  classify -->|support| supportReply
  classify -->|sales| salesReply
  supportReply --> send
  salesReply --> send

Retry loop — a reviewer sends drafts back with a capped revise edge:

flowchart TD
  %%ax draft: briefText:string -> articleText:string(max 800)
  %%ax review: articleText:string -> verdict:class "publish, revise", editorNote?:string
  %%ax publish: articleText:string, editorNote?:string -> finalPost:string

  draft --> review{verdict}
  review -->|publish| publish
  review -->|revise, max 2| draft

Fan-out / fan-in — two perspectives run in parallel, then a judge joins them:

flowchart TD
  %%ax outline: topicText:string -> questionText:string
  %%ax proponent: questionText:string -> proArgument:string
  %%ax skeptic: questionText:string -> conArgument:string
  %%ax judge: proArgument:string, conArgument:string -> verdictSummary:string

  outline --> proponent & skeptic
  proponent & skeptic --> judge

While loop — repeat until a host-owned condition says stop (flow(text, { conditions: { keepPolishing } })):

flowchart TD
  %%ax polish: draftText:string -> polishedText:string
  %%ax grade: polishedText:string -> qualityScore:number(min 0, max 1)

  polish --> grade
  grade -->|while keepPolishing, max 5| polish

Three-way branch and re-join — triage routes to one of three handlers before delivery:

flowchart TD
  %%ax triage: ticketText:string -> ticketClass:class "bug, billing, question"
  %%ax bugHandler: ticketText:string -> replyText:string(max 300)
  %%ax billingHandler: ticketText:string -> replyText:string(max 300)
  %%ax questionHandler: ticketText:string -> replyText:string(max 300)
  %%ax send: replyText:string -> deliveredReply:string

  triage{ticketClass}
  triage -->|bug| bugHandler
  triage -->|billing| billingHandler
  triage -->|question| questionHandler
  bugHandler --> send
  billingHandler --> send
  questionHandler --> send

Judge panel — three independent drafts fan out, then converge on one verdict:

flowchart TD
  %%ax outline: topicText:string -> outlineText:string
  %%ax draftA: outlineText:string -> draftAText:string
  %%ax draftB: outlineText:string -> draftBText:string
  %%ax draftC: outlineText:string -> draftCText:string
  %%ax judge: draftAText:string, draftBText:string, draftCText:string -> verdictText:string

  outline --> draftA & draftB & draftC
  draftA & draftB & draftC --> judge

Escalation ladder — a quality gate either sends the first answer or falls back to level two:

flowchart TD
  %%ax l1Answer: ticketText:string -> answerText:string
  %%ax qualityGate: answerText:string -> verdict:class "pass, escalate"
  %%ax l2Answer: ticketText:string -> answerText:string
  %%ax send: answerText:string -> deliveredAnswer:string

  l1Answer --> qualityGate{verdict}
  qualityGate -->|pass| send
  qualityGate -->|escalate| l2Answer --> send

Itinerary planner — rich contracts stay attached to a simple linear graph:

flowchart TD
  %%ax parse: requestText:string -> destinationName:string, stayWindow:dateRange, travelerCount:number(min 1, max 12), budgetUsd?:number(min 0)
  %%ax plan: destinationName:string, stayWindow:dateRange, travelerCount:number, budgetUsd?:number -> itineraryItems:object{ dayNumber:number(min 1), activityText:string }[]
  %%ax price: itineraryItems:object{ dayNumber:number, activityText:string }[], travelerCount:number -> estimatedTotalUsd:number(min 0), bookingNotes?:string(max 300)

  parse --> plan --> price

Fan-out with capped revision — two sections join, then review can send the assembly back twice:

flowchart TD
  %%ax outline: briefText:string -> outlineText:string
  %%ax sectionA: outlineText:string -> sectionAText:string
  %%ax sectionB: outlineText:string -> sectionBText:string
  %%ax assemble: sectionAText:string, sectionBText:string -> articleText:string
  %%ax review: articleText:string -> verdict:class "approve, revise", reviewNote?:string
  %%ax publish: articleText:string, reviewNote?:string -> publishedArticle:string

  outline --> sectionA & sectionB
  sectionA & sectionB --> assemble --> review{verdict}
  review -->|approve| publish
  review -->|revise, max 2| assemble

Examples

Fetch these for full working code:

Flow — complete flow usage
Mermaid Flow — author/serialize a flow as a mermaid diagram
Auto-Parallel — auto-parallelization
Async Map — async map transforms
Enhanced Demo — instance-based nodes
Flow as Function — flow as callable function
Fluent Builder — fluent builder pattern
Adaptive Provider Balancing — cost, deadline, reliability, and failover routing

Event-Triggered Flows

An AxFlow is an AxProgrammable event target. The runtime maps an event into the Flow's typed initial state and propagates eventContext, cancellation, and idempotency metadata to every node. Abandoned branches still use normal Flow cancellation semantics.

Task-backed MCP tools called by a Flow node register a continuation on the shared event context. axMCPEventRoutes observes progress and resumes the Flow on input-required or terminal task notifications.

For resource-driven wake, discover the endpoint with inspectCatalog() and give AxMCPEventSource an explicit resourceSubscriptions policy. Managed subscriptions reconcile list changes and reconnect separately from the Flow; subscription alone never starts or resumes a Flow.

UCP lifecycle webhooks use the same continuation boundary through AxUCPWebhookEventSource. Correlate on ucp.checkout or ucp.order only after the signed request has been verified and mapped to application identity.

Use eventTarget('id').program(flow).wakeInput(...).resumeInput(...) when wake and resume events have different shapes. Segment-safe eventPath mappings are validated against the Flow signature before any node executes; a declarative .waitFor(kind, path) creates the owned continuation consumed by the resume route.

Reusable eventInput() plans are the preferred callback-free boundary. Callback mapInput is normalized against the Flow signature before any node runs. In generated hosts, immediate publications dispatch inline; the host uses nextDueAt() and runDue() for delayed retries, debounce, and continuation expiry.

Do Not Generate

Do not use new AxFlow(...) for new code.
Do not execute a node before defining it with .node().
Do not use removed terminal shapers like .mapOutput() or .mo().
Do not rely on broad signature inference from arbitrary transform source. Use explicit input/output generics and .returns() for the final output contract.
Do not use generic field names like text, result, data, input, output.
Do not create deep-nested state objects in .map().
Do not create loop conditions that can never change.
Do not add unnecessary dependencies between executes (kills auto-parallelism).
Do not forget to use optional chaining on branch results after .merge().

Repository: ax-llm/ax
Path: website/static/typescript/.well-known/agent-skills/ax-flow/SKILL.md
Commit: 7911e27

Last updated: 5 days ago
First committed: 13 days ago

Is this your skill?

If you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.