This skill helps an LLM generate correct AxGEPA optimization code using @ax-llm/ax. Use when the user asks about AxGEPA, GEPA, Pareto optimization, multi-objective prompt tuning, reflective prompt evolution, validationExamples, maxMetricCalls, or optimizing a generator, flow, or agent tree.
66
80%
Does it follow best practices?
Run evals on this skill
Adds up to 20 points to the overall score
View guide
Low
Low-risk findings worth noting
Use this skill to generate GEPA optimization code. Prefer the top-level optimize(...) helper for normal code, and use direct AxGEPA / AxBootstrapFewShot only when the user needs low-level optimizer control.
optimize(program, train, metric, { studentAI, teacherAI, ... }) for normal generator and flow tuning.ai(), ax(), and flow() for new code.teacherAI and a cheaper studentAI.validationExamples when you have a holdout set.maxMetricCalls to bound optimizer cost; optimize(...) defaults it to 100.program.applyOptimization(result.optimizedProgram!).optimizedProgram.componentMap.axSerializeOptimizedProgram(...) and restore them with axDeserializeOptimizedProgram(...) so the same flow works in browsers and Node.optimize(...) runs AxBootstrapFewShot -> AxGEPA for small starter sets by default, preserving the demos in result.optimizedProgram.demos.optimize(...) and AxGEPA.compile() work for a single generator and for tree-aware roots such as flows or agents with registered optimizable descendants.AxGEPA for flows too.number or Record<string, number>.AxGen evaluator instead of writing a custom judge abstraction.maxMetricCalls must be large enough to cover the initial validation pass over validationExamples.getOptimizableComponents(). If a tree exposes no components, optimization will fail.validationExamples.result.optimizedProgram is the easy-to-apply best candidate. result.paretoFront is the full trade-off set for multi-objective runs.AxGEPA still has its own bootstrap option, but top-level optimize(...) composes the existing AxBootstrapFewShot optimizer before GEPA instead.Choose the evaluation path deliberately:
prediction and example.AxGen evaluator only when the task is genuinely qualitative and hard to score exactly.agent.optimize(...), prefer the built-in judge path instead of manually wrapping a judge metric. Normal agent users usually do not need to set target or metric at all.Rule of thumb:
optimize(...) on AxGen or flow: use a metric first, optionally a plain typed AxGen evaluator if needed.agent.optimize(...): use custom metric for crisp scoring, otherwise let the built-in judge handle scoring. Add judgeAI plus judgeOptions only when you want a stronger or separate judge model.import { ai, ax, optimize, AxAIOpenAIModel } from '@ax-llm/ax';
const student = ai({
name: 'openai',
apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_APIKEY!,
config: { model: AxAIOpenAIModel.GPT54Mini },
});
const teacher = ai({
name: 'openai',
apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_APIKEY!,
config: { model: AxAIOpenAIModel.GPT54 },
});
const classifier = ax(
'emailText:string -> priority:class "high, normal, low", rationale:string'
);
const train = [
{ emailText: 'URGENT: Server down!', priority: 'high' },
{ emailText: 'Weekly newsletter', priority: 'low' },
];
const validation = [
{ emailText: 'Invoice overdue', priority: 'high' },
{ emailText: 'Lunch plans?', priority: 'low' },
];
const metric = ({ prediction, example }: { prediction: any; example: any }) =>
prediction?.priority === example?.priority ? 1 : 0;
const result = await optimize(classifier, train, metric, {
studentAI: student,
teacherAI: teacher,
numTrials: 12,
minibatch: true,
minibatchSize: 4,
earlyStoppingTrials: 4,
sampleCount: 1,
validationExamples: validation,
maxMetricCalls: 120,
});
classifier.applyOptimization(result.optimizedProgram!);
console.log(result.bestScore);import { ai, flow, optimize, AxAIOpenAIModel } from '@ax-llm/ax';
const student = ai({
name: 'openai',
apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_APIKEY!,
config: { model: AxAIOpenAIModel.GPT54Mini },
});
const teacher = ai({
name: 'openai',
apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_APIKEY!,
config: { model: AxAIOpenAIModel.GPT54 },
});
const wf = flow<{ emailText: string }>()
.n('classifier', 'emailText:string -> priority:class "high, normal, low"')
.n(
'rationale',
'emailText:string, priority:string -> rationale:string "One concise sentence"'
)
.e('classifier', (state) => ({ emailText: state.emailText }))
.e('rationale', (state) => ({
emailText: state.emailText,
priority: state.classifierResult.priority,
}))
.r((state) => ({
priority: state.classifierResult.priority,
rationale: state.rationaleResult.rationale,
}));
const train = [
{ emailText: 'URGENT: Server down!', priority: 'high' },
{ emailText: 'Weekly newsletter', priority: 'low' },
];
const validation = [
{ emailText: 'Invoice overdue', priority: 'high' },
{ emailText: 'Lunch plans?', priority: 'low' },
];
const metric = ({ prediction, example }: { prediction: any; example: any }) => {
const accuracy = prediction?.priority === example?.priority ? 1 : 0;
const rationale = typeof prediction?.rationale === 'string'
? prediction.rationale
: '';
const brevity = rationale.length <= 40 ? 1 : rationale.length <= 80 ? 0.5 : 0.1;
return { accuracy, brevity };
};
const result = await optimize(wf, train, metric, {
studentAI: student,
teacherAI: teacher,
numTrials: 16,
minibatch: true,
minibatchSize: 6,
earlyStoppingTrials: 5,
sampleCount: 1,
validationExamples: validation,
maxMetricCalls: 240,
});
for (const point of result.paretoFront) {
console.log(point.scores, point.configuration);
}
wf.applyOptimization(result.optimizedProgram!);
console.log(result.optimizedProgram?.componentMap);// Scalar objective
const scalarMetric = ({ prediction, example }) =>
prediction.answer === example.answer ? 1 : 0;
// Multi-objective
const multiMetric = ({ prediction, example }) => ({
accuracy: prediction.answer === example.answer ? 1 : 0,
brevity:
typeof prediction?.reasoning === 'string' &&
prediction.reasoning.length < 120
? 1
: 0.2,
});0..1 so trade-offs are easy to reason about.const { optimizedProgram, paretoFront } = result;
program.applyOptimization(optimizedProgram!);
// Save for later
const saved = JSON.stringify(optimizedProgram);
// Load later and re-apply
const loaded = JSON.parse(saved);
program.applyOptimization(loaded);optimizedProgram.instruction and optimizedProgram.componentMap.componentMap, keyed by full component key.point.configuration.componentMap.const optimizer = new AxGEPA({
studentAI,
teacherAI,
numTrials: 20,
minibatch: true,
minibatchSize: 5,
minibatchFullEvalSteps: 5,
earlyStoppingTrials: 5,
minImprovementThreshold: 0,
sampleCount: 1,
seed: 42,
verbose: true,
});numTrials: number of reflection/evolution rounds.minibatch: reduce per-round evaluation cost.minibatchSize: examples per minibatch.earlyStoppingTrials: stop after repeated non-improvement.minImprovementThreshold: reject tiny gains below this threshold.seed: stabilize sampling during demos and tests.train and validationExamples arrays.maxMetricCalls for at least one full validation pass plus several rounds.maxMetricCalls.auto: 'light' or fewer numTrials, then scale up.maxMetricCalls being too small: increase it until the initial validation pass fits.program.applyOptimization(...), not just setInstruction(...), so componentMap reaches the full tree.agent.optimize(...), set target: 'actor', 'responder', 'all', or explicit program IDs. The wrapper filters GEPA components to the selected target./Users/vr/src/ax/src/examples/optimize.ts/Users/vr/src/ax/src/examples/gepa.ts/Users/vr/src/ax/src/examples/gepa-flow.ts/Users/vr/src/ax/src/examples/gepa-train-inference.ts/Users/vr/src/ax/src/examples/gepa-quality-vs-speed-optimization.ts/Users/vr/src/ax/src/examples/axagent-gepa-optimization.tsIf you maintain this skill, you can claim it as your own. Once claimed, you can manage eval scenarios, bundle related skills, attach documentation or rules, and ensure cross-agent compatibility.