Content
65%Weight 40%Scale 1-5Reviews the quality of instructions and guidance provided to agents. Good implementation is clear, handles edge cases, and produces reliable results.
A lean, well-organized reference skill with sensible guardrails and appropriate deferral of detail to package docs, but its executable guidance has gaps: the core snippet is not copy-paste ready (undefined `llm`, inconsistent `ax`/`axllm` qualifiers) and there is no sequenced workflow or validation checkpoint for the runtime-wiring tasks it targets.
Suggestions
Make the Core Pattern example complete and copy-paste ready: include the import path, construct the `llm` argument it references, and resolve the `ax.NewAgent` vs `axllm.NewAgent` qualifier inconsistency with the 'Relevant API Surface' section.
Add a short numbered workflow for the main task, e.g. wiring an AxCodeRuntime session: consult `axir-capabilities.json` -> pick a matching example from `examples/` -> choose provider-api or no-key transport -> run and verify locally, so the sequence and validation checkpoint are explicit rather than implied by guardrails.
Trim tokens that duplicate the frontmatter, such as 'Language: Go' and the repeated package path in 'Package Facts', to push conciseness toward the top anchor.
| Dimension | Reasoning | Score |
|---|---|---|
Conciseness | The body is efficient and assumes competence (no explaining what Go or RLM is; facts like 'Real network support: yes' are genuinely additive), but 'Language: Go' and 'Package: `github.com/ax-llm/ax/packages/go`' duplicate the title and description, and the intro paragraph restates the description — minor instances that could be trimmed, so not the every-token-earns-its-place anchor 5. | 4 / 5 |
Actionability | 'Core Pattern' provides concrete Go code, but it references an undefined `llm` variable, uses `ax.NewAgent` while 'Relevant API Surface' lists `axllm.NewAgent` (a package-qualifier inconsistency), and there is no code for the sessions, envelopes, or process runtimes the skill says it covers — key details are missing and execution is deferred to package examples/, matching the 'incomplete / missing key details' anchor rather than the 'minor gaps' anchor 4. | 3 / 5 |
Workflow Clarity | Guardrails give useful decision rules ('Start from package examples', 'Use no-key examples for deterministic local checks') but the skill covers multiple tasks (wiring runtimes, sessions, envelopes) without any sequenced workflow or explicit validation checkpoint; the sequence is implicit at best, fitting anchor 3 rather than the clear-sequence anchor 4, and the simple-skill 5 exception does not apply since this is not a single-action skill. | 3 / 5 |
Progressive Disclosure | The skill is under 50 lines with no bundle files and no need for external reference files; sections are well-organized (When To Use, Package Facts, Core Pattern, Relevant API Surface, Guardrails) and bulk detail is appropriately left in package-side docs (API.md, axir-capabilities.json, examples/), so the simple-skill condition for a top score is met. | 5 / 5 |
Total | 15 / 20 Passed |